I had fun writing my most recent two posts: Advertising agency campaign mentality and PR agency pitch mentality. Based on the large numbers of tweets and comments, the sweeping generalizations were interesting to many.
Joe Chernov suggested in a comment and a tweet that I also talk about clients. What fun! Thanks for the idea. Joe says: "I have to imagine that it's the needy, by-any-means-necessary, our-competitor-was-mentioned-we-weren't clients that are behind the wheel for most of these fender-benders."
In my experience, many companies want to throw money at "that social media thing." They frequently tap the agency they already use for public relations or for advertising work.
The client goes: "Hey, do you guys do social media work, too?"
The agency exec goes: "Yes, of course we do!"
This is exactly what leads to advertising agency campaign mentality and PR agency pitch mentality - an unqualified agency applying the skills of their trade to social media.
But hey, I get it. If you run an agency and a client has a few hundred grand to blow, why turn that down!
RIDICULOUS CLIENT MENTALITY
- The client insists that you talk up their stupid products. "Our products are the best in the industry. Bloggers will want to talk about them."
- The client must approve everything that you do. "We've gotta run the tweet by legal, HR, the CFO, and compliance. I can get the tweet approved in three weeks."
- Within the first week, the client becomes an instant social media expert. "We want to be just like Zappos. Just do what they are doing. Oh and those Blendtec videos are great. Let’s do something like that."
- Clients love gobbledygook. No matter how often you remove it, the crap keeps coming back during marathon approval rounds. "We focus on innovative solutions for new and improved, next generation, cost effective, world class, high performance, value added outcomes."
- Clients demand the impossible and then throw a hissy fit when you explain. "What do you mean we can’t get to number one on Google for the phrase 'iPhone application'?"
- Clients have branding guidelines from hell. "Can you make our tweets show up in PMS 2726 with Neue Helvetica fonts?"
- Clients hate spending any extra money. "Just do a Google Image search. I'm sure you can find a free photo of a slim man with grayish hair playing tennis in the rain. But the guy shouldn't look gay."
- Clients are cheap: "If you charge $20,000 a month retainer, can we just buy one day for $645?"
- Most clients don’t really know what they want. "We want to be hip in a California social media kind of way, but we’re a conservative British investment bank."
- Clients are vague: "The blog needs to look more professional."
- Clients never, ever operate in real time. "I don’t care if the blogger needs a comment now. I'm at lunch. Then I have a meeting. And tomorrow is booked solid. Maybe I can get to it Thursday."
Anyone got any more of these ridiculous client behaviors?
Inspiration from Clients from Hell.
Image: Shutterstock / Franck Boston





Your second mention, the compliance "we-must-control-every-single-micro-action" is a killer and so common among those who still view social media as a tactic, rather than something worth integrating into how we do business.
All 3 posts have been incredibly insightful!
Posted by: Maria Reyes-McDavis | April 27, 2011 at 10:17 AM
Have you seen http://clientsfromhell.net?
Posted by: Meglunde | April 27, 2011 at 10:19 AM
Thanks you Maria - sometimes we can learn from stereotypes.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | April 27, 2011 at 10:19 AM
Ha, you nailed it. There are tons more questions like this that I always joke around with colleagues about. As a PR rep, some of the fun ones are, "can the blogger say this or that?", "just have the bloggers write about it this week" thinking that bloggers work directly for us when as we know in reality it's more of a volunteer basis with the relationships we establish.
Posted by: Craig Kessler | April 27, 2011 at 10:21 AM
David,
I must have officially become a client, because a laughed -- belly laughed -- no fewer than four times reading this post.
I cringed at this one: "We've gotta run the tweet by legal, HR, the CFO, and compliance. I can get the tweet approved in three weeks."
For me this is the best of the three-part series. You nailed it.
Joe
Posted by: Jchernov | April 27, 2011 at 10:22 AM
I would like to suggest to my clients that they actually try to some of the things they suggest themselves.
Perhaps they would realize just how much hard work is involved in what we do.
Posted by: Bonnie L. | April 27, 2011 at 10:27 AM
David so glad I saw this in Facebook today, I needed a laugh.
My favorite is: We want to make our video go viral, how long will that take you? A month? Oh an we only want to spend $300.00 for 120 hours of work, the economy is bad you know.
Posted by: Michele Price | April 27, 2011 at 10:28 AM
Meglunde - yes. Great site. I just amended my post to give them a hat tip.
Craig & Michele - good ones! Thanks!
Bonnie - Indeed. Or maybe suggest something equally impossible in the client's business.
Joe - I appreciate you pitting this bug in my ear.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | April 27, 2011 at 10:31 AM
Started my day today with a big smile reading this Post. I don't dare suggest some others in fear that some clients might recognize themselves. :-) I consistently give my clients the correct advice (for them) even if they don't want to hear it. They know I have their best interests at heart.
Posted by: Diane Meyer | April 27, 2011 at 10:34 AM
These are brutal but often close to the truth for many of us who work in the client-serving industry. I used to work in pharmaceutical PR/marketing, so imagine how much worse social media clients are in a regulated industry! Great list because at least it makes us feel like we're not alone in our frustrations. I guess it points to the amount of education we need to do with our cilent on social media.
Posted by: PR_in_Pink | April 27, 2011 at 10:41 AM
Rather than pointing to the behaviors, why not bring out the causes and focus on resolving the problem at it's source?
What is it that makes clients believe their crappy products can succeed in a "viral" way? Is it the fault of creative and marketing agencies?
While I agree with a lot of the points made here, is the internet and the billions of people on it just too complex to acurately say "throwing money at this won't work?" How can you be so sure?
Great stuff to think about, as always, Scott. This is exactly why I subscribe to your blog. :)
Posted by: Tanner | April 27, 2011 at 10:56 AM
Haha, those gobbledygooks always give me a laugh. Add 'out-of-the-box' and we have a winner ;)
Posted by: Dannydebi | April 27, 2011 at 11:00 AM
My most recent contribution to the ridiculousness: "I don't have time for 20 questions. Just tell me everything you know about social media."
Question is, when will brick and mortar businesses realize they must constantly reinvent themselves to stay competitive? I suspect the next few years are going to shake out a lot of dead wood and result in much more socially aware and customer focused business community.
Don F Perkins
http://mindmulch.net
Posted by: Don F Perkins | April 27, 2011 at 11:02 AM
Tanner - right. "We want to do a viral video."
Good one, Don. Thanks
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | April 27, 2011 at 11:16 AM
We needed a custom illustration (of a cruise ship) for a client and we identified a talented and fair priced artist. We brought the quote to the client - "$XYZ!! Gees.... can't someone just draw a boat?"
Somehow I held a straight face and replied, "Yes, they can. For $XYZ."
Posted by: Bradley H. Smith | April 27, 2011 at 11:41 AM
Ah, memories!
Before I became a worker who controls the means of production, I earned my daily crust as a hired pen in the trenches of PR and marketing.
My colleague and I were often saddled with idiots in the client organization who had to pass judgment on our work.
Far too often the default feedback ran something along the lines of "Can you make it more better?"
We solved most of these problems with "gorilla hands" (an obscure reference to an Alexander King memoir). We would insert something in the first draft so glaringly wrong that even the densest subaltern couldn't miss it.
Triumphantly, they'd point out our 'stupid' mistake, we'd 'correct' it, and the piece was good to go.
Saved us tons of time. And we never reduced our fee.
Posted by: Kelly Monaghan | April 27, 2011 at 12:42 PM
My favorite is when you meet with the client to brainstorm, produce a social marketing plan that they approve and agree to, and then they never give you the content that they agreed they would provide you. When the three month run is over -- I used to take on clients indefinitely or for a three-month "push" before they formally took over -- they're always so surprised that they didn't achieve their goals (even though you asked them a million times throughout the last ninety days for the content, and explained over and over why you need that content).
I do not miss freelance at all.
Posted by: Elizabeth Kaylene | April 27, 2011 at 12:47 PM
HAH is LOL!
Posted by: MCatherine | April 27, 2011 at 01:53 PM
I am in agreement with Tanner who says "why not bring out the causes and focus on resolving the problem at it's source?" It kind of makes me cringe to read this long list of "rants" about customers we are all working so hard to attract.
Posted by: CMasi | April 27, 2011 at 10:48 PM
The "professional" thing killed me. A previous client just didn't want to rock the boat, they wanted to look and sound like their larger competitors...literally. Can you say "yawn"?
Posted by: Fernando Labastida | April 28, 2011 at 12:09 AM
Hi David,
I'm glad you've already been recommended clients from hell - because that one makes me smile every day.
This is such a sad but true reflection on the sterotypical client and their surrounding colleagues. I've seen it for years - not just in social media.
The classic for me is no matter what you do as an agency to plan, it's so often ignored by the client. Weeks of saying I need a decision ... I need content are often ignored until the timescales are so compressed you end up polishing a turd if you excuse the phrase.
No one wins in these situations - the client is hacked off, the agency is totally fed up and the quality of the work isn't as good as it could be.
I was brave a couple of weeks ago and sacked a multinational client after our first project, I'd spent a year trying to win - because of the reasons above. They were shocked. I was relieved.
Keep 'em coming.
Best wishes,
Mark
Posted by: Mark Copeman | April 28, 2011 at 02:22 AM
So I tried to get a large tourism lodge operator interested in an opportunistic one-off FB campaign. When the marketing manager eventually did get back to me she asked if I could prepare a one-page summary so that she could submit it to her team for consideration at their next marketing meeting! :-)
Posted by: SimonEspley | April 28, 2011 at 06:19 AM
Kelly - H1! Love that. Make the client look smart when they correct the glaringly obvious so the real stuff slides through unscathed. Nice!
Elisabeth - Right. THere are less than 1% of clients that are absolutely real time!
Tanner & CMasi - this and the two other posts are just my editorial comment as I see it. Nothing more. If you want a more detailed analysis, my seven books are where to go.
Fernando - Yep. Yawn. That's what mostly results from this stuff.
Mark - I've sacked a few clients myself. I actually think it is a good idea to sack your least successful 10% of clients each year. The constant "upgrade" is good for business and keeps you and your team sharp.
Thanks all for this fun discussion!
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | April 28, 2011 at 06:23 AM
I love these examples.
I've recently come across "We can get my son to do this - he wants to go to film school and he has all the kit. It'll save us some money."
A lot of clients suddenly have children or grandchildren who can do the work, but they still want to talk to you and get your opinion.
Because the technology is available to all, the amateur / pro line gets increasingly blurry - if you let it.
Joe
Posted by: JoePelissier | April 28, 2011 at 08:00 AM
The scary part is I'm sure all of these originated from an actual client demand. Often more than one.
Posted by: Alexa | April 28, 2011 at 10:53 AM
David,
Thank you, very funny. Unfortunately, I'm sure they're not all jokes.
Not really a question, more of a situation I've run into is a company that wants to be more social, more authentic, but refuses to give their employees access to twitter/linkedin/facebook, and has a policy against mentioning the company by name on their personal accounts.
We've a long way to go.
David
Posted by: Djbressler | April 28, 2011 at 02:19 PM
My favorite one for photos(in Orange County) is: "We need to appeal to all ethnicities so can you get us an Asian couple, a Hispanic Couple, a Black couple and a white couple and have them ALL being best friends!"
Jason
www.wallisphoto.com
Posted by: Wallisphoto | April 28, 2011 at 04:10 PM
David, you create three blog posts that expose the apparent "talent puddle" that exists in the marketplace today.
Here's a question for you, is the term "professional marketer" becoming somewhat of an oxymoron?
Posted by: David H. Deans | April 28, 2011 at 06:00 PM
I laughed so hard while reading this post I had to wipe tears from my eyes!!
The part about Gobbledygook is so true!! Makes me groan every time I see it!
Posted by: Nina | April 29, 2011 at 12:46 AM
Loved this post, David. The "clients are cheap" comment brought back memories of Chris Rock in I'm Gonna Git You Sucka (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNQRqAoT-2c). Thanks for the laughs and the insight. I've re-shared with our readers as well at http://blog.reachforce.com/marketing-tips/weekly-wrap-up/friday-wrap-up-this-week-in-b2b-marketing-tips-9/
Posted by: Drew Sollberger | April 29, 2011 at 01:07 PM
Truly scary & insightful. Nailed it big time!
Posted by: Manu Chatlani | April 30, 2011 at 06:31 PM
how about this one, "we want our tweet to pop."
Posted by: Chris | May 02, 2011 at 05:06 PM
I always smile when I find companies that want a social media presence yet block their employees from using social media in the workplace.
The delayed blogger response is also very telling. Naturally the same client will expect the blogger to immediately retract or amend an 'incorrect' post.
Posted by: Jeremywoolf | May 03, 2011 at 04:18 AM
Joe - "We can get my son to do this - he wants to go to film school." Sadly that happens a lot. Imagine saying the same thing about your sun who wants to go to law school or dental school?
Djbressler - yes they are funny but no they are not jokes. These things have all happened.
wallisphoto - don't forget a mixed race couple!
dhdeans - not sure there ever was such a thing. Everyone thinks they are an expert when it comes to marketing. "I like the dark blue for the logo."
Nina, Drew, Manu, Chris - Thanks!
Jeremy - Glad to hear the same silliness applies in Asia.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | May 03, 2011 at 05:38 AM
What is old is new again. I suffered a horrible flashback when I read: "We want to be just like Zappos." and "those Blendtec videos are great. Let’s do something like that."
The countless new business meetings I have gone to where the client said. "We want to be the next 'X Inside' just like Intel, but we have no budget." ...Just shoot me now!
Posted by: Steveology | May 03, 2011 at 03:00 PM
Steve -- Yup. These days the clients all want to "do something like the Old Spice Guy"
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | May 03, 2011 at 03:51 PM
This is hilarious.
I come from the PR agency world and couldn't agree more that PR agencies think social media is the same as PR.
The first action item they always take of a program is target list and pitching. Off to land some big hits and all that.
On all the gripes I hear here, I keep asking myself - why are so many companies so incompetent in general. At well.... everything.
Posted by: David King | May 04, 2011 at 06:41 PM
"How do we make this go viral?"
Love this post David.
-Deana
Posted by: blondedigital | May 11, 2011 at 05:49 AM