« Metrics to Show How a Content Marketing Editorial Calendar Drives New Business | Main | Outlaw the phrase "Social Media" at work »

October 30, 2012


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Bob James

Slips like these tell you that true vulgarians are behind these brands.

Samantha Stone

I am very grateful for your post and the rationality you are providing the marketing community. Several of my credit card companies sent notices out to affected areas notifying them that late fees will be waived this week, and offered emergency cash assistance to anyone who needs help due to the storm. Their notices were sincere and relevant. The kind of examples I believe you intended with your book.

David Meerman Scott

Samantha - Yes, thank you for offering those. I agree that the credit card company examples are valuable information for consumers when power is out and are therefore a legitimate use of newsjacking.


Great post, David. Couldn't agree more. HubSpot (whose content I generally enjoy), should have never put that post up. It was in really poor taste and I would imagine someone, somewhere at HubSpot agrees.

I also found the Sears post to be in really poor taste and tweeted at them publicly to indicate so. What would have been much more helpful would have been to offer to donate items to shelters, etc. in heavily affected areas.

Finally, I too received the bank and credit card notices referenced by Samantha and thought they were appropriate and in good taste and it left me feeling even more glad (if one can feel glad about having credit cards) that I was a customer.

Brett Heitz

Frankly, it's surprising that an exceptional company like HubSpot would post such a thing. When it comes to people's lives being threatened by a natural disaster, I don't think there's any excuse for newsjacking unless it aims to help those in need. At least they revised their post somewhat. Still, I expect better from them and hope others won't make similar mistakes in the future.

David Meerman Scott

Brett and Jamie - thanks for jumping in. Yes, in this case, newsjacking is legitimate when it is seen as helping those in need.

Jamie, I think the Sears example is okay in the sense that the products talked about can make people's lives better in the aftermath of the storm. But like I said, it would be much more appropriate had they posted a widget that allowed consumers to see real-time updates on availability of things like generators in each of their stores.

John Norman

Hubspot seems to be making a habit of this sort of behavior lately.

Here's one where a Hubspot employee leaves a comment about over-the-pants-hand-jobs with a commenter's underage daughter. In a public feed, during work hours, with the Hubspot brand attached: http://digitalstrategy.typepad.com/digital_strategy/2012/10/why-you-need-a-social-media-policy-even-if-youre-hubspot.html

Volpe chimes in at the comments to note that the employee made a poor judgement call. But you put enough of these things together and we get a narrative about leadership and the kind of people who work there.

If you don't have a policy for avoiding stuff like these two situations that's fine. But then leadership needs to take responsibility for bad hires, bad actors and doing something meaningful when the bad happens. Saying someone made a poor decision doesn't qualify.

Heath Umbach

Very well said. It can be a thin line to walk, but really it shouldn't be. Marketers are always looking for that next bright idea or hook to capture attention and drive traffic. This is a good reminder that you should always try and bake in time (if only a pause) to push away from the keyboard and ask a tough question or two. I too agree the Sears approach could be better, but isn't really an issue. Great post.

Jane Hiscock

I wonder if this is a case of systematizing something in the minds of young marketers that we cannot systematize.

There are lives, global economies, and people’s livelihoods at stake. But I have seen this before with young, fast paced marketers who are trying to do the right thing by putting their brands everywhere. The problem is that the system requires common sense, application of thought and ethics. I'm not saying that the blogger or Hubspot lacks ethics – I actually don’t believe that to be the case - but I do think that as marketers we need to work just as hard to help our employees do the right thing as we do to encourage them to do the most creative things in the shortest periods of time.

As always David a great dialogue to open up here.

David Meerman Scott

Heath - With each new marketing technique, the limits get tested. Email marketing leads to spam and then there is a backlash. SEO leads to black hat techniques and then there is a backlash. Newsjacking is a new concept and people are testing the outer boundaries.

Jen Zingsheim

I'm really glad you commented on this, as the author of Newsjacking your words carry a lot of weight.

I saw the Hubspot post last night, and had the same reaction: the Sears example is okay, but the rest seem crass and tone-deaf to the situation at hand.

Mike Volpe - CMO @ HubSpot

I want to be very clear and apologize for the article. The tone was completely wrong and insensitive. We are deeply concerned about our friends affected by the storm and we even have many employees still without power. The tone of this article was in poor taste.

Obviously we had nothing to do with the other companies mentioned who did the newsjacking, we were reporting on those attempts. However the author of the article passed a value judgement on them and we should not have done that.

The tone of the article should have been "Are these newsjacking attempts right or wrong?" or "Should you newsjack a natural disaster?". I think then having the marketing community discuss the merits of the different newsjacking attempts in the comments is a worthwhile discussion.

I have taken the article down.

David Meerman Scott

John Norman - I have read the post you mention. I do not see the two things related. In this post, I wanted to talk about inappropriate newsjacking. The issue you site is one of bad judgement. I don't agree that you can take these two isolated incidents and make a case about something systemic at HubSpot.

Jane Hiscock - I remember back several decades when I was a young marketer. I think there is potential danger with some people and with some companies that it is getting attention at all costs. I was guilty of that once. I am not suggesting that's the case with HubSpot here. I'm just offering my view on their take on newsjacking the storm with the hope, as you say, to help people do the right thing.

David Meerman Scott

Mike, thank you for jumping in.

While I do agree that the tone of the blog post was off, the post actually sparked a very important debate. This is a discussion that needed to happen.


I posted this on your Facebook page as well and I hope you'll forgive the duplication. We are trying to use our community resources to help people and share useful information. If you or any of your readers have suggestions for how we can help, please tweet them to @MarketingCloud.

I hope no one thinks I am being opportunistic posting this here. This is part of a sincere effort to ask as many people as possible what we can do besides just compiling mentions of the hurricane. Currently we are re-tweeting shelter information and information from emergency services, but I want us to do more if we can.

David B. Thomas
Salesforce Marketing Cloud

Mike Volpe - CMO @ HubSpot


1) Rather than removing the original post, I have changed it so (a) it contains an apology and (b) we the marketing community can discuss the right and wrong of newsjacking in the comments.

2) HubSpot is making a $5,000 donation to the Red Cross to support those affected by Sandy.



An example of positive newsjacking, IMO (assuming, of course, it's not a scam!).



With all due respect, David, this post feels like newsjacking a newsjack of a newsjack.

Hubspot made an error in the tone / evaluative slant of their post as they commented on brand newsjacks, but your response here feels less like an opinion piece on a controversial strategy, and more like a book promotion -- there's a cover image and a title link in the first fold.

It is salient, of course, that you wrote a book on the topic as you share your opinion, but writing this post the morning of the day after the hurricane, writing it about a company that you advise, including two links to promote your book and using the cover image as the first image in the post immediately struck me as opportunistic.

I honestly don't mean any disrespect, as I'm sure you don't to Hubspot here (and for the record, that post infuriated me), but you may have erred a little on the wrong side of sensitivity here.

David Meerman Scott

Meg, thanks for that input. I debated putting the cover as an image in the post. Now I wish I hadn't.

Laurel Miltner

David, in regard to your most recent comment in response to Mike, I couldn't agree with you more. Definitely an important topic as we move into the real-time, newsjacking reality of marketing today. (And Mike, thanks for sharing your honest sentiments.)

I saw a Ragan's article yesterday offering tips on how to pitch the media (or most likely, not) during the disaster - http://www.prdaily.com/Main/Articles/13035.aspx. Thankfully, it encouraged PR pros to avoid making pitches during this time. I admit I had some concerns upon clicking through that it may offer tips to distastefully newsjack the storm.



Thanks for this post and the attempt to clarify when newsjacking goes too far. If a brand has something useful to add to the discussion that happens to promote one of their products-- so be it. I don't see it as an intrusion for businesses to share that they have power or supplies available when there is clearly a demand for those things.

What is clearly in poor taste are things like this: on my Facebook wall yesterday was a post from a jewelry company advertising an "online storm sale" accompanied by a photo of a hurricane storm cloud with jewelry flying inside of it. Wish I was making it up.

Mark Bower (@markbower)

Well said David. And kudos for speaking out despite being on the Hubspot payroll.

Framed prints

You're right, news-jacking is a powerful tool, but should be used with care and consideration - not only for the news item itself, but for the product being associated with it. People are more and more aware of brands and branding and attuned to the ways they try to self-promote. So always be candid and honest and upfront - even about your news-jacking!


It had to be said and you said it. Piggyback Publicity, as I often refer to it, can be very powerful in spreading your message. The question is, What message are you sending? When the message you're sending is that you're an insensitive baboon, you may want to reconsider.

Great stuff as always David.

Author, Step Into The Spotlight!

Brian Whalley

David - I think the safe rule for newsjacking is: Is this issue killing anyone or depriving them of the essentials of life?

The Arab Spring was off-limits (Kenneth Cole learned that one)
Hurricanes also (HealthWorks, HubSpot, others) People died, are dying, and are losing their homes and more
Steve Jobs (AppSumo, by accident, sent an email with a subject line referencing SJ the morning after he died)
These countless examples of people who don't know and make these mistakes can go on and on. I think the rule works though. A friend of mine tried to counter with, "What about alcohol, or cancer?"

That's right - You can newsjack alcohol generally, but if a celebrity or someone visible dies from alcohol abuse, it's inappropriate to newsjack that story with your own messaging. The overall topic of cancer is something you can build something on (maybe, I wouldn't do this but I could be convinced there's a way), but don't do it the day someone dies of cancer.

I think this is a safe rule. What do you think?

(Disclaimer: I am a former employee of HubSpot.)

David Meerman Scott

Thanks to all for jumping in on this. The discussion has been excellent.

Stacey Donelan

Loved your post, David. I totally agree with you and was also very shocked by the many irresponsible social media posts during Sandy!

In light of your term, a co-worker of mine now refers to this unsuitable behavior as "newsjack(ass)ing," in which she further describes in the blog post below. Check it out here:


David Meerman Scott

Thank you Stacey. I just commented on Amy's blog.

Jessica Zimet

Thanks for posting David. I think actually disasters and emergencies do afford an opportunity for companies to promote themselves in one important way: by offering value and help to those affected. Whether they are donating funds, products or services, running a fundraiser, or providing volunteers, companies can help people and communities, and get credit for doing so by their communities and employees. You could call that newsjacking because they do get coverage, and that is certainly part of why they do it, but it's legit, and perhaps the only truly appropriate way to respond to this type of situation.

I think that's the direction you were going with what Sears could do - how can they provide value for those affected? I'm sure there are many better examples, but two I can think of from my industry include during Katrina when the operators quickly enabled a program where donations could be made for victims via text messages, and now in the wake of Sandy, opertors that have partnered to provide free, seamless roaming to consumers left without enough tower coverage on their cell phones.

Tim Lawler

I have been following this discussion for the past few days and have found it fascinating! As someone who is both studying and interning in public relations (but am by no means a professional), I am intrigued with the concept of newsjacking. It seems like a simple concept at first. All you have to do is redirect the momentum of a breaking news story, while providing a unique perspective, towards your company. However, as the examples from HubSpot and Kenneth Cole have shown us, it is much more difficult than it seems.

Based on my limited experience, one of the most challenging things about public relations is the short window available for responding. When something goes wrong (or right in some cases), a quick response is needed, regardless of whether or not all the information is available. It is also the same with newsjacking. In order to benefit from a story's momentum, a response is needed within hours, or days with a crisis like Hurricane Sandy.

This is likely what went wrong with the previous instances. I personally don't believe that these businesses were trying to offend. They probably viewed their posts as being lighthearted and humorous. Unfortunately, in a rush to newsjack Sandy as fast as possible, they seemed to forget to stop and think about how the public would perceive their posts. This is where the balance between posting quickly and posting thoughtfully comes into play. In my opinion, it is better post later but thoughtfully than to respond earlier but questionably. The public will still appreciate the former (even if it is late) but be outraged with the later (even though it was posted earlier).

While newsjacking a very powerful too, it is still new and unfamiliar. After all, it can difficult to predict what posts will work and which won't. However, I do believe that David's guidelines are great rules to follow. A company needs to have relevance to the event taking place and tragedy should never be exploited.

David Meerman Scott

Jessica - A good example is Duracell. They've set up mobile phone charging stations in areas without power. People are praising the effort on their Facebook page. http://www.facebook.com/duracell

Tim - thanks for jumping in. Yes, there is a much shorter window than in the past because of the real-time nature of the social web. I suspect what happened with companies like American Apparel that got called out for being inappropriate is that someone charged with generating attention jumped in to Newsjack while those charged with reputation management didn't know what was happening. It's a learning experience for all of us.

Martin Kang

As a general rule of thumb, it is only okay to newsjack a sad news story like Hurricane Sandy if you are offering assistance of some kind. If you are simply promoting your own product, then be prepared for public backlash.

Even the Sear's tweet is borderline poor taste. They should have at least offered some type of discount to help those that are currently struggling with no electricity to show they genuinely care as opposed to simply wanting to sell products.


At last, I received the bank and credit card notices referenced by Samantha and thought they were appropriate and in good taste and it left me feeling even more glad that I was a customer.

woolrich outlet

Unfortunately, in a rush to newsjack Sandy as fast as possible, they seemed to forget to stop and think about how the public would perceive their posts. This is where the balance between posting quickly and posting thoughtfully comes into play. In my opinion, it is better post later but thoughtfully than to respond earlier but questionably.

Almost Isn’t Good Enough

I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your site. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme? Excellent work!

David Meerman Scott

My design work is done by @Eymer

Alan Fascia

Great discussion guys and I am really happy to read this post!

The comments to this entry are closed.


Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

follow me

David Meerman Scott books

I want to speak at your next event!


David Meerman Scott e-books

David's iPhone and iPad apps

Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 12/2004