Are you a marketer or PR pro looking for a job?
Prepare for a reality check.
What happens if I Google the name on your resume and the most recent company you worked for?
When I am asked to vet a candidate for one of the companies I am associated with, the first thing I do is head to Google and see what content appears. And that's what I suggest potential employers do.
On the Web, you are what you publish
Sadly, for many job seekers, what pops up on Google are a few random things (like your membership in the company softball league), your LinkedIn profile, and not much else. Sometimes there is a Twitter feed but frequently it was started years earlier and has been abandoned or it's only updated a few times a month.
With more senior people, I always laugh when the top content when I Google your name is the press release that your company issued a few years earlier to announce you are joining.
Today's marketing and PR is about content creation. Your personal brand is also about content creation.
If you don’t care enough to build your personal brand then why should a company employ you to create a brand for them?
On Saturday at #SXSW, I met with my good friend Jon Ferrara (@jon_ferrara) who is the CEO of Nimble. Jon told me that he has a position open for a senior-level marketer and wanted to get my advice on the sort of person he should hire.
I told Jon to never look at a resume. Just delete it. Instead, administer the "Google test." We agreed that eliminates nearly all candidates from consideration.
People like Jon look for potential hires who are very active on social media and creating content. Jon and the other CEOs and senior executives I work with are not looking for professional managers. They are not looking for agency wranglers. They are not looking for talkers, they are looking for doers. They want marketers (even at the senior level) who are passionate about creating content on the Web.
Insisting on a positive result for the "Google test" makes it tough for CEOs like Jon to find qualified people, but greatly increases the chances that the marketer who ends up getting hired will be a good fit for achieving the company’s goals. Jon told me that anyone who wants to be his top marketer needs to be at least as successful on social networks as he is. Seems reasonable to me!
Prove you are a great marketer
The good news is that you can fix the problem that eliminates you from consideration for the hottest jobs.
You need to show, don't tell. You need evidence that you are passionate about your personal brand. You need to create content. Now. Starting today.
There are a bunch of things you can do, starting today, that might include some of the following: You could start a blog, create a YouTube channel, or tweet more than a few times a month. You could create an infographic about the industry you want to work in or your particular area of expertise. You could get active on some newer channels like Google Plus, Instagram and Pinterest so you can speak intelligently about them. You could sit on panels at events like SXSW and have people in the audience talk about you on social channels. These are just a few examples.
I've delivered this advice to hundreds of people. Sadly for them, I know from experience that 90% of people ignore this advice.
Will you be in the 10%?
I am convinced if you are a job seeker, you need to pay attention to this tough love.
Bonus for reading this far: People who get really clever with this strategy then target companies they want to work for and create content (a blog post or video for example) that relates to that company. Perhaps a suggestion for how that company can do something different. You want to get noticed by the marketing department of your target company? Forget sending a resume. Instead create something interesting and publish it on the Web. Your potential hiring manager will be eager to consume your work and you brand yourself as a player.





The timing on this post is funny. I just Tweeted this yesterday: "Was just asked by a client to provide a resume. Found it bizarre they would ask, which is kind of bizarre." For three years now, I've pointed prospective clients to my online profiles and properties not my resume. I had to create one.
While I agree that it is doubly - no, triply - more important for marketers to pass the Google Test as you call it, I would argue that this goes for anyone in the job market today. Ignore at your own peril.
I just published a free ebook that teaches people how to use blogs and social media for their own personal career development (http://www.careergravity.com).
Posted by: Jon DiPietro | March 12, 2012 at 11:36 AM
Great post! It is increasingly important to have a presence on the internet. Time and time again I am appalled when college juniors, seniors, and recent graduates don't have a LinkedIn or know what it is.
As your article pointed out its more than just having a LinkedIn account. However that’s a simple step that people seem to be missing.
Posted by: JennyKay Pollock | March 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM
Jon DiPietro - Exactly. The last resume I did was a decade ago. I agree that this technique is more suited to PR and marketing roles, but absolutely can be applied to all.
JennyKay - yes, you will need more than just a LinkedIn.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 12, 2012 at 12:35 PM
Amazing how times have changed. I've spent the last few months increasing my online presence because I understand the importance of it in a PR job search. Didn't think it was this extreme yet, but I like it. Saves us all a lot of trees - no more resume copies to lug around!
Posted by: Cathy H. | March 12, 2012 at 01:11 PM
David,
Great advice on why it's more important than ever to build your personal brand. I don't accept the excuse I've heard before that marketing people are too busy building their clients or companies brand. It shouldn't be a persons primary goal but if your doing your marketing job right today then your personal brand should authentically grow also. Mike Volpe of HubSpot is a perfect example.
I especially love the bonus paragraph about creating a post about the company your seeking to join. That alone could demonstrate proficiency!
I always dig reading your words but I adore hearing them in person. Thx for the amazing moments at #SXSW. Your great peeps and I love hanging with you.
Best,
Jon
Jon Ferrara
CEO | Nimble - Turn Social Contacts into Customers
@jon_Ferrara | www.nimble.com
Posted by: Jon_Ferrara | March 12, 2012 at 01:32 PM
Cathy - exactly. But be prepared that some potential employers will still insist on a resume. But if so, you should ask yourself - is this a place you want to work?
Jon - I'm so glad that we had that conversation on Saturday because it gave me a lot to think about to create this post. And yes, it is always a pleasure. Thanks for adding the comment about no excuses. I hear that a lot too. People are too busy to build a personal brand? That's probably okay if you're, say, an accountant. But not as a marketer or PR pro.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 12, 2012 at 01:44 PM
The resume is not dead yet - large companies (and a growing number of small organizations) require that you enter data into their system. All the information found in a resume.
Should you have an online presence? I'm in the camp that says yes, if for no other reason than it's expected of us as marketing and pr professionals. However, this constant barrage of how everything is going the way of Google or social is overplaying their role in society.
Yes, Google and social media have been transformative. But we still have 25% of the U.S. without Internet in their home - and the poorer you are the more likely that you will NOT have internet in your home. Smart companies will focus on applications that can be filled out via mobile phones for this reason. The socio-economic divide of access is not only among the 1% and 99%, but within the technology-enabled and those without.
I use my large, extended family as a litmus for the pervasiveness of technology: There are about 65 of us among first aunts, uncles and cousins. Of those, maybe 60% are on Facebook, less than half have smart phones, maybe 15% are on LinkedIn in and I'm the only one on Twitter. We are split 50/50 on white collar work versus blue collar or hourly.
Again, I appreciate the importance of an online presence but the reality is HR professionals and most corporate executives aren't getting rid of resume requests in favor of a website and blog posts. We're at least a decade away from that, in my opinion.
Posted by: Jennifer Brown | March 12, 2012 at 01:57 PM
David:
Great piece. It is a content world and as a coach, I have been preaching the mantra for several years. Show your stuff!!!
http://prjobcoach.blogspot.com/2010/11/is-resume-dead.html
Best regards,
Gerry
Posted by: Gerard Corbett | March 12, 2012 at 02:33 PM
Very true David. Case in point: I started interning at HootSuite 3 and a half weeks ago. I won't go into details, but I got pretty creative with my approach to getting noticed. Interesting to see that Google syndrome is extending to employers searching candidates as well.
For me, there was no resume, no cover letter. They read my blog and tweets.
For this industry, you have to prove to people that you can develop your own online brand. If you can't, then how can you help the company continue to develop theirs?
Posted by: Connor Meaks | March 12, 2012 at 02:46 PM
Jennifer - Thanks for the reality check. My blog post was a focus on marketing & PR jobs. While I do think the technique also works for other jobs, it's not going to help with all.
Gerry - Exactly. Show your stuff.
Connor - AWESOME. Thanks for jumping in with an example of exactly what I am talking about. No resume and no cover letter but an active Twitter and blog worked for you and it can work for others. Many thanks.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 12, 2012 at 03:07 PM
The resume' may not be dead, but what is deadly are the "job / resume submission" services companies hire like Brassring. They discourage creativity and personality.
I am a tad biased > www.iBradley.com
Posted by: Bradley H. Smith | March 12, 2012 at 03:43 PM
This a very naive article. Many people have common names and their name spaces may be highly competitive. As someone who once held six positions on the front page of Google for my own name I eventually found it compelling to "share the space" with some of the other people, many of whom are just as notable as me or more.
To demand that a high-quality marketer dominate his or her name space for due diligence creates a new form of search spam that we do not need. And in the age of online reputation management, you can believe what you find in Google's search results about as much as you can believe what you find on a resume.
Posted by: Michael Martinez | March 12, 2012 at 06:23 PM
David,
Great post, while I agree in part I must also take to task and play devil's advocate here.
The resume may be dying, but it will die very slowly. A comment or two from above make good points. First, many are not on LinkedIn yet, you recently just created a profile yourself, congrats.
Being an executive recruiter for 20 years I believe many, many people are not on LinkedIn, and are a bit, content, shy. To tell you the truth, and depending on the executive role I am recruiting for, I find this an advantage. Many quality candidates can be found, but it takes more than a simple Google search and many times, it takes deep digging to find any mention of them. This happened today, and boy is it a great candidate.
Playing devil's advocate here: I would Google the executives asking for candidates to have a robust online presence and see if they, themselves have one. If not, why are they asking for something that they themselves do not do.
All the best
Posted by: Alan Fluhrer | March 12, 2012 at 07:03 PM
Hi David,
Great post. I am currently seeking a position in marketing and have found that even if employers require a resume, many still want to see evidence that you're as social media savvy as you say you are. I have even seen "Must have a strong personal online presence" in the requirements of multiple job listings. In my opinion, any marketing professional should be promoting their own personal brand online regardless if they're employed or unemployed. If nothing else, it provides us with continuous professional development as the technology changes and grows.
Posted by: Gail Gromaski | March 12, 2012 at 07:07 PM
I am very glad that there is a way to get my dream job without a traditional resume. I want to do community management and social media marketing for a consumer web startup, but I have no relevant experience. I wasn’t even a marketing major. I have little work experience of any kind. I wasn’t an exceptional student, and didn’t join many clubs. Unless I am ridiculously overqualified for a job (ie retail) my resume will not stand out from the hundreds of competitors.
Enter the Internet. I am able to jump right to the front of the line for marketing positions with consumer web companies because I live on the web and I have a do-first, plan-later approach. I very nearly got my dream marketing internship without ever being asked for a resume.
I just evangelized their product for free without asking permission, logged my activity, then presented that activity in a cold email, along with my pitch. They weren’t even hiring for that position, but they agreed to create it and have me fill it. That particular gig fell through, but I am confident that I can get a similar one.
I outlined my strategy in detail here: http://colemanfoley.com/post/19208975687/how-a-non-technical-person-can-get-noticed-by-a-startup
Posted by: Coleman Foley | March 12, 2012 at 08:42 PM
Rotorua Museum of Art and History is looking to appoint several key positions to join the team at one of New Zealand's most dynamic museums and art galleries.
Posted by: Social Media | March 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM
Michael - you didn't read my post. I said: "What happens if I Google the name on your resume and the most recent company you worked for?" And I specifically am talking about marketing & PR jobs here, so even if you have a common name, it is highly unlikely that there will be any issues finding you.
Alan - thanks for being devil's advocate. I partly understand with other roles. But anyone who is hiring a marketer or PR pro today and is not focused on how candidates brand themselves online is simply not serving their company well. As a recruiter, you should be encouraging people (especially marketers and PR folks) to get with it. And my LinkedIn status is different. I work for myself.
Gail - thanks so much for sharing your experience. Many people tell me the same thing.
Coleman - you are the poster child for why this technique works!! Thanks again for sharing.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 13, 2012 at 04:39 AM
Thanks David for your great (and very true!) post. I concur, but there is only one 'but'. As I have found out for myself, if you have a very strong personal brand and are social enough to build a big network, there is no need for you as a PR- or marketingperson to work at a company. Hence there is no need to hand in your resume or apply for the job. Heck, work as a freelancer or start you own company! It is a daunting thing to do in this unstabile economy - but now is the time to invest in yourself!
Although I still don't agree on your LinkedIn-status. LinkedIn is a search engine, like Google or YouTube. If anyone is looking for a marketing speaker, with your immense network it might be easy to always find you first in the results. It might seem odd that a lot of unknown people invite you, but it actually increases the likelihood of being found first in the results, because LinkedIn takes in account the 1st, 2nd and 3rd degree of contacts...
Posted by: Remco Janssen | March 13, 2012 at 05:09 AM
Excellent commentry David, plus this works in reverse. Any sales rep that goes into a client meeting without first conducting the Google test should be charged with malpractice of his/her profession. If nothing else it provides additional talking points around their experience and their challenges and prevents you from telling them how wonderful you and your company are!
Posted by: Bob Zagami | March 13, 2012 at 06:52 AM
Thanks Remco. I certainly agree with you. After 15 years of being an employee, I struck out on my own ten years ago. It was the best professional decision I have made. As soon as I book a gig via LinkedIn I'll be a fan!
Bob - Great point. Thanks!
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 13, 2012 at 08:31 AM
Great article. Creating content is definitely the best way to stay relevant as a job seeker. It also lets the potential employer know that staying engaged in various media platforms helps me to keep my skill set fresh and adaptable.
Thank you!
Posted by: Ebony Hillsman | March 13, 2012 at 10:11 AM
Find someone with that strong an online presence and I'll show you someone who spends more of their working day managing their own blogs and posts than on the company that are paying them.
I want someone to be savvy with social media and online presence, but show me someone whose CV demonstrates strong delivery, idea generation and ROI delivery and that's a candidate more attuned to commercial success.
Posted by: Jon Marris | March 13, 2012 at 10:20 AM
Jon Marris - I guess we disagree. Thanks for the comment.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 13, 2012 at 10:34 AM
Great post if you are looking for a job in marketing David.
If the proof is in the pudding, then Google-searching gives you the filling, while a CV could just be the glossy looking pastry that might be hiding a bland taste, awful texture and lack of tangible experience?
Here's an idea, why not add a few hyperlinks/QR codes to your CV, illustrating some of your work?
As you have stressed above, I think this is key for those working in marketing, and will only be more important as companies expect their marketeers to be experts in social media and customer engagement.
In other fields, we can expect this to become more important, but with a significant lag time.
At the moment, most of the less career-savvy people I know are still using Twitter to tell me what TV programme they just watched. Others are using it to voice expletives about their team having just lost a soccer game. Neither makes me particularly want to hire them, for any function.
Posted by: Paul | March 13, 2012 at 01:41 PM
Yes! Excellent post David! You just outlined the exact job searching strategy that I've employed. Reading this was very encouraging. I've used content creation and activity across a variety of social networks to enhance my personal brand. If you're curious, you can see my story at http://HireDaveCutler.com (you'll find that as Paul suggest above, my resume also features QR codes). Thank you for writing this.
Posted by: CutlerDave | March 13, 2012 at 03:00 PM
Excellent as always David. I've heard people refer to this as 'giving good google' I don't know if that is appropriate in mixed company though. Also want to thank you for the inspiration. We think that the google test can ad value to social media recruiting strategy - http://blog.yoh.com/2012/03/your-social-media-recruiting-strategy-and-the-google-test.html
Posted by: Joel Capperella | March 13, 2012 at 03:15 PM
Paul - great idea on adding links and QR codes to a resume. That applies to university applications too!
Dave - Excellent. Good luck with your search!
Joel - many thanks for adding to this discussion by blogging about it too. Interesting that you did a Google test of my name and HubSpot. I had never done that before. Glad to see there are a lot of great links!
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 13, 2012 at 03:44 PM
David,
Even with the other comments to the contrary, it is definitely growing well beyond just Marketing and PR jobs getting tough love. This great Economist article (based on LinkedIn research) http://www.economist.com/node/21549948 shows sales as the fastest shrinking job category. This is a huge change for business and will impact many jobs within any given company.
(here comes an unpaid and unsolicited compliment to you David> Paying attention to your writings and rants, we have eliminated the position of marketing and sales at our "old fashioned" print shop and I am now officially the Entrepreneur In Residence. No outside sales, no marketing director role, we have changed the way our entire organization looks at jobs/resumes/work requirements.
Branding here best works when we've met the requirements set by the client. So for now, as a company as well as an individual, it might well be better to have an authentic brand that attracts interested collaborators, customers, and prospects to your proven and active strengths rather than trying to be all things to all people.
You can read the first steps of my transition here on my blog: http://blog.kendall-press.com/2012/03/entrepreneur-in-residence-at-kendall.html
A traditional resume or job search is unlikely to do well in many evolving roles at companies big and small.
Posted by: Keith Spiro | March 13, 2012 at 03:53 PM
Keith - What a great comment. It means a lot to me that you've achieved success by implementing some of my ideas and some of HubSpot's as well. I do appreciate you letting me know. Keep up the good work.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 13, 2012 at 04:04 PM
I am about to graduate from university with a business degree in marketing, so I found this article particularly relevant. Although I have already accepted a full-time job, I am still interested in improving my online brand.
My peers and I were required to create a blog for our social media class, which I took last spring. I believe that writing is one of my strengths and I would like to display this using my blog, but my blog does not show up in a Google search of my name. I have it linked to my Twitter account, but is that enough? Is there a way that I can make sure it is displayed on searches of my name?
Thanks,
Marissa
Posted by: Marissa Pura | March 14, 2012 at 12:53 AM
Marissa - good for you to find a job already but you will have a long career and you need to build your personal brand over the long haul. It sounds like you need to work on the SEO aspects of your blog. You should consider making a unique URL -- I note that MarissaPura.com is available and would buy that immediately and use that for your blog. Good luck.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 14, 2012 at 05:56 AM
Thanks! One minor point/tip. These days search results are personalized by login and cookies. So before you do the "Google test", be sure to log out of your Google profile (or better yet use someone else's computer) otherwise you'll get a distorted view of the search results. By logging out and deleting cookies you'll see how the results look to the hiring manager.
Posted by: Colin Warwick | March 14, 2012 at 09:16 AM
Colin - an excellent point. I have a "clean" Firefox browser I use for that. Thanks!
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 14, 2012 at 01:34 PM
I think you just pushed my rant button cuz I couldn't disagree with you more on this one.
"If you don’t care enough to build your personal brand then why should a company employ you to create a brand for them?"
the BEST marketers i know, you may not know. You know why? Because THEY ARE BUSY DOING THE WORK. And let's be clear, they are always busy.
Some of the most useless marketers i know? Yeah. I bet you know them. They are really really senior. They are really really important. They have great bubble diagrams on their flikr account and they couldn't execute a go to market strategy if you paid them a million bucks and put the word innovation in their title 50 times.
So while the resume is only one way to view someone -- just bc you are a great writer on a blog or are engaged actively on twitter doesn't mean squat when it comes to driving the networked marketing future.
ok, rant over.
Posted by: Leighh | March 14, 2012 at 02:30 PM
Thank you for the rant, Leighh!
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 14, 2012 at 02:46 PM
I think this article has some relevant points but the need/requirement is WAY overstated. As a career marketer who has worked on the client side across the branding spectrum up to the COO level and as a consultant, I have focused my time and energies on building the businesses I worked on NOT on building my own reputation, brand, or online presence. I am on LinkedIn in a primarily passive status as well as a few other career networking sites. It has not inhibited my opportunities that I can see nor has it stopped recruiters from finding me, clients from soliciting me or former subordinates and peers from contacting me. (There is some of that due to the small, remote market I live in and the fact most recruiters assume I am not interested in moving, which is actually not true.) Most of my work has been on tangible products, CPG but also increasingly services. The metrics there are pretty clear in terms of increases in volume, distribution, contribution, attendance, revenue, membership, etc. Smart companies looking to hire for the kind of marketing I do will focus on that. I can see, however, where it would be different for someone in PR or doing what I call "soft" marketing...trying to change perceptions, not clearly focused on a revenue or product sales goal, etc. Those jobs are often more difficult to measure anyway as can be seen byt the average tenure of a CMO of top SVP/VP of Marketing. My sense is that while a certain amount of online presence is requisite, as is solid understanding of its role in campaigns, the extent to which it is material for me as a product marketer is less than for those in other pursuits or slivers of the profession. You may not agree with this as a distinction but it would seem from some of the above that you glossed over this. Each to his own. Certainly your POV supports your overall shtick online.
Posted by: Wade Souza | March 14, 2012 at 03:46 PM
Wade - thanks for jumping in.
In my post, I talked about my feelings as well as those of the CEOs I know and advise such as Jon from Nimble. I also talk about this idea on the speaking circuit at my corporate gigs at companies I've delivered talks for like Cisco, HP, PwC, GenRe, Microsoft, McCormick, Nestle Purina, Ford Motor Company, Century 21, Dow Jones, & many many more.
The approach is to go to Google and search for a candidate's name and their most recent company to see what that brings up. Clearly in your case, you wouldn't pass that test in the companies I'm affiliated with or the companies I speak to. But that doesn't mean you aren't valuable to different organizations.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 14, 2012 at 04:18 PM
David,
I'm interested in the senior marketing job at Nimble. Google me for my profile.
Thanks,
Barry Gilbert
Posted by: Barrythinks | March 15, 2012 at 02:00 AM
Barry - Hopefully Jon at Nimble will read these comments. If not, you need to think of a clever way to get his attention. Good luck.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 15, 2012 at 04:09 AM
While I know that you are talking specifically about marketing and PR folks in this post, I think this information is applicable to all industries. In fact, in our space it's expected but in other industries showing thought leadership in the industry could be even more profound.
I forwarded to a couple of my friends who are looking at a career move so thank you!
Posted by: Gibsondm | March 15, 2012 at 01:00 PM
Gibsondm - I agree with you. For example, my daughter is now in university and studying neuroscience. I've told her about these ideas and she is beginning to build an online identity. Thanks for passing this on to others.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 15, 2012 at 01:11 PM
Want to say someone did a video for a job w/ Google or Apple? IIRC it got a little buzz - but no job. That kind of creativity may work David, but only for the 'right fit' kind of place. See also, Wade's comment about the type of job.
I must give a shout out to Jennifer's good reality check. Many organizations and their HR departments want, insist upon that resume - electronic so it can be scanned for keywords as they check off qualities like they're ordering staff from a catalog. Forward-thinking companies looking for top talent that is creative, independent, self-starters, they may be doing the Google search - but that's just not always the case.
Which brings my question: what CEO/COO/VP/Director is doing a Google search anyway? It's semi-rhetorical b/c IME someone in PR or Corporate Communications may have a job opening (or looking for outside support), they tell HR - and that's where it ends. These days it's all hidden job market and getting past the gatekeepers - otherwise no one sees your name, has a chance to Google.
"You need to show, don't tell." Word! ITA with your point - we all probably should better job to pass the Google test, making sure our online talk walks the walk - I just don't think it's enough. "If a great blogger blogs in the woods but no one reads it..." I write that all the time b/c you can create a good online presence - but if you don't get that Google search in front of the right people, it won't matter. FWIW.
Posted by: Davina K. Brewer | March 20, 2012 at 01:42 PM
Davina - I would ask this question: Do you really want to work for a company that treats you (via your resume) as a set of keywords in a checkbox? I certainly don't. I would want to work for the sort of company that is eager to hire truly talented people for marketing roles.
Also, like getting into Harvard, it seems people frequently reach for Apple & Google. Why go where everybody goes? Why not target a company you identify with on a deeper level than just the fact that they are big and famous.
David
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 20, 2012 at 02:20 PM
It's funny David - I've made those decisions my whole life.. deciding who I didn't want to work for, what kind of jobs I just wasn't the right person for and it's better for the company or client to look elsewhere. But it's a luxury and I've paid for it in other ways. You're talking about culture and wouldn't we all LOVE to find companies that don't keyword search resumes, firms who take that approach to hiring talent; alas I haven't run across that many - yet. FWIW.
Posted by: Davina K. Brewer | March 21, 2012 at 05:54 PM
Davina - we only have one opportunity to live a career. It is what you make of it. I worked for companies for 15 years and found it frustrating. For the last ten years I have been out on my own and it has been exhilarating.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 22, 2012 at 04:24 AM
It really is all about developing a creative mind these days - even in the most remedial jobs. Employers are now looking more towards creativity and personality rather than skillset as their primary decision elements. I guess this is because a lot of companies these days are able to reserve some of their resources for training.
Posted by: Nick - YourRecruit Leatherhead | February 14, 2013 at 07:35 AM
Hello..
good blog for the marketing jobs for the good for the helpful for the different jobs for the blog for the good marketing for the blogpost.
Posted by: Jobs In Marketing | March 28, 2013 at 04:05 AM