I'm getting more email pitches that start out with "Dear Blogger".
What a silly way to try to get attention! Here are some of the many problems with this approach:
Dear Blogger tells people that you don’t care enough about them to read their blog and learn their name.
It's much better if you personalize your pitch with an appropriate greeting and some detail about why they were selected.
Dear Blogger means that it is a broadcast pitch going to many other people.
Those of us who create content are looking for something new and different, not the same old thing that everyone else is seeing. When PR people send me a pitch that begins "Dear Blogger" I trash it without reading because I'm simply not interested in being one of many.
It's much better to target one or several people instead of sending a broadcast pitch to a hundred random people you found on a list.
People who write blogs are more than just bloggers.
Bloggers are passionate about what they write about. Most of us share our passion on some combination of other social networks like Twitter and G+ and LinkedIn and Facebook and YouTube. We have "day jobs". Many of us write in other formats (books, newspaper articles, research reports). Some of us are on the speaking circuit. Some of us are quoted in the media.
I get pitched by PR people several hundred times a week. I'm okay with that because now and then there is something interesting that I use. But you've got to let me decide how to use it! Don’t assume I will blog it. Would you like to be in my next book? How about a mention when I am next interviewed on television? Interested in a tweet or a mention on G+? How about having me write about you in the Huffington Post? How about making your story part of my keynote speech?
It's much better to make your pitch and assume that the person has other ways to talk you up than just on their blog. If we’re active in one media (a blog) chances are close to 100% that we are active in other media.
"Dear blogger" is a symptom of poor pitching. Why not take the time to pitch effectively?





David, how about pitches with grammatical and spelling errors in them? Ouch. :(
Posted by: Elaine_Fogel | December 14, 2011 at 01:32 PM
Just got another one of these myself. What's so ludicrous about it is that it's pretty easy to find my name on my blog. It would probably take about 5 seconds to figure out.
Yet it starts with "Dear Blogger". It's a terrible way to build relationships.
Posted by: Brandon R Allen | December 14, 2011 at 01:38 PM
Sooo right! Anything that I get that addresses me as Dear Recipient, Homeowner, Blogger, PR Pro goes straight to trash. Sad part is that I get about as many of them as I do for drugs suggesting that they will help me have a 14 inch erection. Yeah right!
Posted by: John Sacke | December 14, 2011 at 02:00 PM
Elaine - Yes! But as a poor speller myself, I can forgive that.
Brandon - Exactly. It would take one second to learn my name.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | December 14, 2011 at 02:01 PM
The telemarketing equivalent of this is, "May I speak with the person in charge of xxxxx..." My canned response now is, "If you don't know who that is, then no you can't." Click.
Posted by: Jon DiPietro (@JonDiPietro) | December 14, 2011 at 02:15 PM
Being involved in marketing for over 15yrs, this isn't new. Like you David, I too 'accept' a certain amount of 'spamming' as I sometimes use it for my own purposes. But I still delete close to 90% of my email unopened. Bad subjects, bad addresses, bad lead copy all 'lead' me to simply pass over their pitch/subject. Relevancy can usually be determined in the first 5-10 words of any communication. Just my experience.
Posted by: Kevin @globalfibernet | December 14, 2011 at 02:30 PM
David,
Being a recent reader and commenter, I just wanted to point out something I'm sure you've already been told. Your url, webinknow.com - i have been reading as- we b in know... Obviously not your intention, but ironically works just as well.
Posted by: Kevin @globalfibernet | December 14, 2011 at 02:33 PM
John - My bank sent something "Dear Small Business Owner"
Jon - You're much more polite than me with telemarketers.
Kevin - I wish I was so clever as to have done that on purpose. I did not. It was a happy accident. I made it "Web Ink Now" but it can also be read "Web In Know" and as you noticed "We B in Know".
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | December 14, 2011 at 02:42 PM
I'm also a big believer in adding a bit of (appropriate) humor when pitching to someone. Keep it short. Keep it simple. Allow them to repsond quickly.
Posted by: Djwaldow | December 14, 2011 at 03:41 PM
David,
Successful media relations practitioners realize the importance of (1) knowing your audience and (2) reading their material.
Posted by: Tbartlett21 | December 14, 2011 at 06:54 PM
I have a special filter for those...I wish it would catch the ones with the terrible grammar compliments of Google translate.
With a hugely diverse blog, I will never stop shaking my head at the pitches which have ZERO to do with any topic I have ever blogged.
Red.
Posted by: AnnMarieDwyer | December 14, 2011 at 07:43 PM
I almost always try to find out the person's name before I email them. You sound like a robot if you don't.
Posted by: Carl | December 14, 2011 at 08:12 PM
Djwaldow - I agree on humor. We're human after all, not blog bots.
Red - Yikes. I should start keeping a list of off topic pitches. An art gallery opening in Santa Fe? I new customer for a chemical company in India?
Tbartlett21 & Carl - Indeed. It comes back to fundamentals.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | December 15, 2011 at 03:42 AM
It's the most basic of things that people get wrong - if you are really passionate about working with the blogger you are contacting it's courteous to at least find out their name, also reading their 'About' page and a few posts beforehand is great way to find out more about the person and what they write about.
Posted by: preeti | December 15, 2011 at 05:48 AM
A flag comes up everytime I read a general opening in an email! I agree with your comment on allowing the blogger how he will use the message and/or content!
It really annoys me when after the "Dear Blogger" you get very detailed instructions on how the content should be published on your blog!
Posted by: Raul | December 15, 2011 at 06:33 AM
my fave one's are companies pitching "demand generation that starts off with Dear NAME.
Love it :) :)
Posted by: KENNY | December 15, 2011 at 09:00 AM
I have a question David...
How did they know you were a blogger in the first place? Maybe you're not ;)
But these "Dear Website Owner,", "Dear Webmaster,", "Dear _______ " types of pitches immediately go to the trash bin in my inbox.
My question is, why are they making this so hard for themselves? They have to know this approach won't get too many responses...they just have to, LOL. :)
Posted by: JosephRatliff | December 15, 2011 at 10:28 AM
Agree, it's just lazy. 'Communicate' surely infers to 'talk with someone' or 'be in contact with someone' and unless you're talking to a group at large, you should always start the felicitations with a name. If you've ever opened up the home page on a blog - it's not hard to find out the name of the blogger. Ditto, pitching to magazines and newspapers. (Having said that, I am not whiter than pale - I too have in the past believed I'm too busy to ring a magazine to find out the name of an editor, and lo and behold, my pitch has not been attended to!)
Posted by: Johanna | December 15, 2011 at 06:37 PM
Joseph - But they don't know it is wrong. The PR agencies probably assign a junior staffer who was never trained properly.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | December 16, 2011 at 03:12 AM
I've been thinking about writing on this topic also. It seems to be getting worse. As I like to say on my podcast, if you wish to connect me please remember my name is not Hi, Hello or dear blogger.
Even worse are the emails letting me know how much they really enjoy my blog and suggest my followers mights enjoy x topic that has nothing to do with my blog.
It's amazing after all these years of blogging, podcasts and social media in general -- agencies are still trying to use social media for direct mass marketing (and apply the same tactics.)
Rosh
Posted by: Rosh Sillars | December 20, 2011 at 04:15 PM