This morning my Australian friends lit up Twitter talking about an epic Twitter #fail from Qantas Airways. I saw messages from Trevor Young, Jim Stewart and others pointing me to what was the top trending topic in Australia today.
Turns out the Australian airline announced a contest on Twitter.
Most times a contest like this would be just one of thousands that populate Twitter at any one time. Normally there would be no backlash.
Timing is important
The reason this blew up is due to terrible timing. In the past month, Qantas had faced a major strike, which grounded the fleet and has experienced ongoing disputes with the unions that represent pilots, mechanics, baggage handlers, and caterers.
The travelling public was greatly inconvenienced during this period of turmoil and cancelled flights. I had friends who couldn’t make it to America for long-planned meetings because of the strike.
Qantas offering this frivolous contest struck people as insensitive.
The frustration was taken out by people who used the #QantasLuxury hashtag to vent their frustrations. Here are a few I found:
@2FBS: #QantasLuxury is dressing your staff in t-shirts that say "We're Sorry" and believing that makes up for missing a friends funeral.
@GrogsGamut: #QantasLuxury - when the passengers arrive before the couriers delivering the lockout notices do
@mrpaulb: #QantasLuxury is having gold plated taps in the bathroom where some poor qantaspr person is throwing up right now
@indednsible: #qantasluxury is when they enforce 11 hours of artificial night on the MEL-LAX flight, and hand you a plastic bag full of junk-food.
@Ivalaine: #qantasluxury having your bags "misplaced" not just at arrival after 28 hours of travel. but then "misplacing" them again when you get home
I've learned a bunch of things from this.
1) Timing is important. If you are dealing with sensitive corporate issues, you should think carefully before implementing a fun campaign.
2) When you offer people a chance to use a Twitter hashtag, they will. But you don’t have any control over what they say. You need to be prepared for negativity.
3) The prize in this contest was lame. You get the amenity kit that first class passengers get. Big deal – some PJs and a toothbrush. If you want to do a contest right, offer a really valuable prize.
4) As I’ve talked about many times, in a real-time world news jumps quickly from social media to mainstream media. As of this writing, there are well over 100 mainstream media stories about this. I’m sure there will be many more.
5) Anyone seen a newsjack of this story yet?





I don't know if I call this newsjacking, but someone has in real-time created a YouTube parody http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTCwPlWzZnQ&feature=share
Posted by: Jimewel | November 22, 2011 at 10:15 AM
Epic fail... really?! Unfortunate timing (I'd even discuss bad timing) is all it is.
Digital people should lighten up a bit.
Posted by: Bas | November 22, 2011 at 10:31 AM
Qantas as a brand is an #epicfail right now. The Twitter promotion simply exposed how out of touch with reality they seem to be.
Posted by: LANTS | November 22, 2011 at 01:22 PM
David, I thought you might like job description I wrote for the new social media manager's job at QANTAS -> http://www.theideasguy.com/business-building/job-ad-social-media-manager-qantas/
Posted by: Tim Reid | November 22, 2011 at 07:16 PM
It just goes to show how bad timing can erode a brand's online presence, especially on a site like Twitter where people can use hash tags any way they want. It can turn your brand into an open target.
Posted by: MicroSourcing | November 23, 2011 at 03:37 AM
David great post. Couldn't agree more about timing, lameness and the leap from social media to mainstream news. Australian senior corporate affairs people last week (http://www.cardencalder.com/2011/11/qantasluxury-social-media-stand-up.html) were talking about social media rules of engagement and the interplay with traditional media...this is going to make a great case study. Qantas (normally great at PR) failed communication 101 - "know your audience" on this one.
Posted by: Carden Calder | November 23, 2011 at 07:00 AM
Like Qantas made a couple of mistakes in the past and the twitter announcement is indeed a perfect example of bad timing and Qantas doesn't know at the moment what they are doing, but just looking at the past couple months and forgetting of how good they were last years does that make them a bad company?
Posted by: Scott Paddingville | November 23, 2011 at 08:52 PM
Epic fail indeed.Maybe they are not expecting this to happen.It was just a typo error on there side.LOL.Funny how they came up with such ridiculous news.
Posted by: Discount Ink | November 24, 2011 at 02:56 PM
Couldn't agree more David. One additional point I would make is that it makes the consumer think the company is just plain insensitive. What you didn't report was that the company walked away from IR negotiations the day before which was widely reported, then switched on this online marketing campaign.
Qantas also come across as disorganised. I suspect management didn't tell marcoms and/or marcoms wasn't paying attention to what the big picture was like. If they were then it just demonstrates their incompetence at communicating internally. Any social media/marketing noob could see this train wreck coming a mile away if they were aware of the big picture. Why didn't someone say something?
I've been blogging about Qantas from a marcom's perspective for the last few weeks and it seems to be quite a big deal for many Australian's. We generally consider Qantas as our national carrier and have a strong emotional connection to the brand, it's part of our national identity.
Well, at least until now.
Qantas has a lot to do to regain the high degree of trust it had with its main market here in Australia. This campaign is a great example of how to suck at going about doing it.
Posted by: Steve Fogg | November 24, 2011 at 10:12 PM
Steve -- exactly. It seems that by not paying attention to what is going on, Qantas comes across as not caring. Thanks.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | November 25, 2011 at 07:51 AM
This #fail interests me greatly due to the simple fact that Twitter is such a new social media medium. It is interesting to see who ran the twitter account for Quantas and who approved the starting of this contest. Considering all of the negative things the company was already involved in you would think this "poor timing" would be a #duh! not a #whoknew? The public backlash through this is going to teach the company a good lesson (or the individual who may or may not have their job still) on what is appropriate behavior for utilizing such a public and social form of media. At least some of us can appreciate learning from their mistakes!
Posted by: Taylor | November 27, 2011 at 09:12 PM