UPDATE - On the evening of December 1, BMW of North America responded to the issues I highlighted in this post. Do make sure to read what they said (11th comment down).
+++++++++++++
Many years ago I opted in to emails from BMW because I wanted to get notice when they released short films in their excellent series. For example, I liked The Star featuring Madonna and directed by Guy Richie. At the time these films were a new and exciting form of online marketing and I wanted to know when new ones came out. I wrote about BMW's use of video on my blog back in 2007 and included a mention in one of my books.
Gradually over the years my email address seemed to be added to BMW sales lists as well so I opted out of all emails from BMW last year.
Like most people, I am on a bunch of lists that seem to grow like weeds. Every time I buy something online, I'm added to a new list. I frequently opt out and that's the end of it, but I do not keep a tally of opt outs. There are too many and most companies simply honor my request and stop sending me email.
I distinctly recall opting out of BMW emails so it was strange to me based on my habits that I would mysteriously be added back somehow against my wishes.
So when I again received an email from BMW in November 2011, I opted out again but this time I kept a screenshot record showing I opted out from all items in their list.
The opt out itself was very convoluted. I clicked an UNSUBSCRIBE link on the email and got a sort of "Communications Preferences" error notice followed by an automated email linking me to a place where I could push buttons to opt out of each type of mailing. Click the thumbnail to see what I did.
Note that I do not own a BMW so there is no other way I can think of where I would have been added to their lists.
After that opt out, I again got an email from BMW!
This one was from BMW of North America with a subject line "Shop BMW gifts on Cyber Monday." This email most certainly arrived after I expressed my preference to receive no more emails and recorded the attempt.
Perhaps there is an explanation and if so I would love to hear it.
Maybe there are many different lists for BMW and they require different opt out methods (this one was from BMW of North America)? Perhaps it is user error and I did something wrong several times in a row? Perhaps their system takes many days to process requests and I need to independently opt out of each type of mailing (silly in a real-time world but possible)? I really want to give them the benefit of the doubt.
Even if there is a good explanation for what happened to me, I would like to suggest that as a company that prides itself on quality and engineering, BMW is failing with their marketing.
I wanted to see BMW videos and ended up being hit up to buy Holiday gifts from BMW.
Email marketing is a certainly a component of quality and engineering, and BMW need to re-think how they communicate. The 4 step opt out procedure itself is sort of stupid and the fact that it doesn't actually opt me out is unacceptable.





Humble yourself, i believe you want a new BMW more than they need your Business! I wish they would spam me!
Posted by: Edikt LLC | November 30, 2011 at 03:35 AM
My guess: BMW rented lists for a Cyber Monday blow-out. When renting a list, it may not be possible with every vendor to purge opt-outs prior to the blast. So even though you opted out of their internal list, the "PR Rock Star" list BMW payed $.99 per name for still had your name on it. Or, perhaps their database is controlled by that silly iDrive interface...
Posted by: Brian L. Hill | November 30, 2011 at 10:36 AM
Brian - Never thought of that. Hmm...
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | November 30, 2011 at 03:37 PM
Rented list = SPAM so, if BMW indeed rented a list, the answer to the question in the title of your post is "yes" :)
Posted by: Ruth Sheahan | November 30, 2011 at 06:12 PM
I hear you! The only way I could get a handful of companies to weed my address off of every list they created (and they seem to multiple like rabbits) was to either ask about it on Twitter. (somewhat effective) or call a phone number and leave a message. Very effective.
From the bottom feeding spam artists you expect it (and for that I email the web host if I can find it) from brands you adore, it feels like a let down.
Carolyn
Posted by: Carolyn Winter | November 30, 2011 at 09:12 PM
I'm with Carolyn. It's the brands you have most respect for that suffer the most from this sort of disrespectful behaviour. And - while we're on the subject - I believe we should be lobbying the legislators to mandate a one-click unsubscribe. All this multi-step nonsense is both unnecessary and hugely irritating.
Posted by: Bob Apollo | December 01, 2011 at 03:23 AM
Carolyn and Bob -- YES!!
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | December 01, 2011 at 04:34 AM
I agree that the unclear, multiple-step opt-outs are a pain (not to mention purposely confusing). But, often you're notified that just because you unsubscribe does not mean you will be automatically taken off lists--it can take 7-10 days. My guess is that they use a third party to operate that, and therefore are not directly responsible.
Anymore, I just expect to receive less targeted emails (along with the ones I'm interested in) any time I opt in. I don't think it's something that will change, and I don't blame the brand for it.
Posted by: Indianaprolis.wordpress.com | December 01, 2011 at 09:38 AM
Not only should emails be easy to opt out of, but accounts should also be easy to terminate. I am SICK of searching for 10 minutes for the link, then being forced to enter survey information, to terminate an account I have on a site. Good marketing should not involve this strange confusing trickery.
Posted by: Jammie | December 01, 2011 at 02:23 PM
I've gotten to where I "bounce" these spam if I can't unsubscribe in one click.
Posted by: Brenda Sullivan | December 01, 2011 at 04:12 PM
We came across your blog entry and would like to apologize for your receipt of e-mails from us after you unsubscribed from our mailing list. A now resolved software issue caused some people who opted out of e-mail to be added to two recent mailings in error.
Your entry this week was good timing as, over the last few days, we’ve been addressing the very issue of developing a streamlined process for managing email subscriptions and opt-outs (including "one-click" opt-out). We plan to launch it next year to resolve many of the concerns you’ve raised. BMW takes CAN-SPAM very seriously and we’re dedicated to offering an experience that not only follows the letter and spirit of the law but is easy to use.
Thanks to everyone on the thread for your feedback; we are listening and are looking forward to offering improved experiences for managing email subscriptions in the near future. We encourage anyone with further concerns about BMW email communications to contact the BMW Customer Relations and Services Department Monday through Friday from 9:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M., Eastern Time. You can reach us at 1-800-831-1117 or via e-mail at customer.relations@bmwusa.com.
Thank you, BMW of North America, LLC
Posted by: BMW of North America | December 01, 2011 at 09:21 PM
David,
Its great to see the speed at which BMW responded to your post.
I think this sort of situation offers up a good learning experience for brands both big and small to ensure that there is a global opt-out process if they in fact have a "preference" or "communication" center as a part of their opt-in or opt-out process. Global opt-out can easily be implemented both on the data side and the subscriber experience.
Preference centers or opt-down options for the subscriber can be a great thing for large organizations, but the brand should be cognizant of the fact that in the digital ADD culture that we live in, people demand speed and efficiency from companies today.
I have often blogged and spoken to many brand marketers about not being afraid of the unsubscribe. In fact, brands should embrace it and look for ways to learn from people who simply don't want to get email anymore.
Andrew Kordek
@andrewkordek
Posted by: Andrewkordek | December 01, 2011 at 10:33 PM
Thank you BMW for responding here in public as well as reaching out to me privately. I'm glad you are taking these observations seriously and are working to resolve the issues I described.
Andrew - Yes on the ADD part. I think in today's real-time world "we will remove you in a week" is just not good enough.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | December 02, 2011 at 05:07 AM
Kudos to BMW for the appropriate response. I'm an email marketer that does NOT operate in the massive and complex world of these international brands. My clients each have one list that is overseen by one marketing team. But it is still baffling how this could have happened. And why will an acceptable opt-out process not be in place ASAP, rather than "plan to launch it next year."
As others have said, it's big brands such as BMW with the most to lose. The value of their brand exceeds the value of brick-and-mortar factories and inventories of parts.
Posted by: Mark Vogel | December 02, 2011 at 08:12 AM
I bet this was a case of them switching vendors..(ESP Vendors. Parting ESP said "here is your data, figure it out" and by that lumping in unsubs, unknown users, who then get put back into the general population. Seen it a thousand times.
Posted by: Haus | December 02, 2011 at 10:50 AM
AND Yes, big KUDOS to BMW. As a proud customer of theirs, I appreciate their initiative to be monitoring the forums concerning this and making a 1:1 effort to explain and resolve.
Cheers,
Haus
Posted by: Haus | December 02, 2011 at 10:51 AM
I think I'm going to get a BMW
Posted by: Kennick | December 02, 2011 at 02:06 PM
David - Thanks for sharing and also it is excellent to see a brand come to the table to not only defend themselves but admit some blame as well.
As an email marketing agency CEO, I know that email is often used as "lead and revenue machine" without much further thought and reflection. "We'll figure out it and deal with issues after we send" is often the mindset. Additonally, CAN-SPAM is not optional or a best practice. It's the law here in the US (and one that is lighter than international laws).
This story shows that great brands like BMW can make short sighted mistakes that could lead to far reaching implications when it comes to brand perception and loyalty. So before you think about just firing off the next email (or social, mobile or whatever) campaign or considering email list sources that dont involve direct permission right to your brand, remember this incident.
Regards
Simms Jenkins
CEO - BrightWave Marketing
Author of "The Truth About Email Marketing"
@SimmsJenkins
Posted by: Simms Jenkins - CEO, BrightWave Marketing | December 02, 2011 at 02:11 PM
Mark and Haus -- thanks for jumping in.
Simms - I really appreciate your perspective. Yes, email marketing is more than leads. As you say, their behavior has far reaching implications.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | December 02, 2011 at 02:51 PM
Another reason to buy a BMW.
Posted by: Volkan | December 02, 2011 at 04:54 PM
I want to jump on the complimentary bandwagon. I am a fan of both BMW and corporate ownership of mistakes. While one would expect 'respectable' corporations to lead by example, sadly that is not often the case. On instances such as this where a company truly does try to do the right thing, I like to acknowledge that at least as much as I would a complaint.
As a marketing professional, I can honestly say... there are a bajillion reasons that could have left you on the list. What is more important is, when you called them out, they responded. FYI, it is a fact, the larger the corporation, the more complicated the process to extricate one person completely from a database. Simple economy of scale.
Posted by: Kevin Aires | December 02, 2011 at 05:57 PM
"Additonally, CAN-SPAM is not optional or a best practice. It's the law here in the US (and one that is lighter than international laws)."
Too true. CAN SPAM is widely regarded outside the USA as meaning "yes, you CAN SPAM everyone".
But even the toughest anti-spam laws can still involve loop-holes and escape clauses in practice. Australia's Anti-Spam law imposes a minimum penalty on conviction of AUD$110,000 per offense (ie: per message) for individuals, and AUD$1.1 million per offense for companies. While it has certainly worked in reducing Spam originating locally, it hasn't succeeded in eliminating all Spam.
Posted by: John Counsel | December 05, 2011 at 11:12 AM
I am sure BMW, like all big companies use a variety of different software packages to interact with their consumers. These software packages are all independent from each other and don't necessarily talk to each other. Opting out an email should send a trigger to all these software packages but it always takes time to implement these auto triggers which could cause the issue you were having. Between opt-out integration efforts and software bugs, I can easily see this happening.
Posted by: Agent Nadia Huliai | December 16, 2011 at 10:43 AM
Sorry but the FTC will do NOTHING at all. Email and fax spammers have no enforcement from our government. I tried for months filing complaints about fax spammers and the FTC could care less. These companies were reported per instructions. All numbers on the DNC list as well. Violations galore but our law enforcement agencies have no interest in dealing wit this. Heck they didn't even care about Bernie Madoff when that guy handed him on a silver platter 4 times to the SEC.
Posted by: Sandy Bridge Xeon | April 27, 2013 at 03:35 AM