My daughter and many of her friends went through the process of applying to university this year.
In my day, with paper applications, we applied to our top choice, a few "reach" schools (selective schools we were less likely to be accepted to) and a "safety" (one highly likely to accept us for admission). It was a pain in the butt to write to each school to get their paper admission form and type out each application individually.
Today, with information on college Web sites and electronic applications, students zip off applications quickly because most of the information is stored as electronic files. An additional application might take less than an hour to complete with cutting and pasting. Now it is not uncommon for students to apply to ten or more universities, driving up rejection rates at select schools. If all it takes is the $90 fee and a few minutes, why not apply to Harvard? Heck, you could win the lottery.
Some idea is at play for job search. It is so easy to search for openings on online job boards and company web sites and then just zap over your electronic CV even if you're not qualified. In the old days of paper it was more difficult to find out where the openings were and to actually apply required writing a cover letter, licking stamps and whatnot, so fewer people applied for positions.
The web has developed a culture of planning for failure
Our kids apply to schools they have almost no chance of getting into because it is easy. We apply for jobs that we know will attract 1,000 applications or more because it is simple to do so.
The web makes it so darned easy to try something. Therefore, today we’re planning for failure in a different way than when we operated in the paper-based offline-world.
But that same idea of planning for failure is lacking in many marketing departments
In the old days of offline marketing, we planned our "campaigns" months or even quarters ahead. It was expensive and time consuming to do a print direct mail campaign or plan a trade show exhibit. So we planned only a dozen or so initiatives in a year and expected each one to contribute a positive ROI.
But today, it is simple and free to create a YouTube video or blog post or to write an ebook in order to market a business online. Like the college application and job search markets, creating valuable information for attracting new customers is much, much easier than in the offline world.
Yet most marketers treat these online initiatives like an old offline campaign. They take time to get everything perfect. They plan months ahead, losing opportunities to communicate in real-time. They create only a dozen things online in a year rather than hundreds.
If you're like many marketers I meet, you need to do much more than you're doing now.
Marketers need to plan for failure
The problem with information on the web is that nobody knows with certainty which video or ebook will succeed, so finding success is partly a numbers game requiring investment in many ideas.
I don't know if anyone will care about this blog post. It could attract 10,000 or more readers by being tweeted by hundreds of people. A journalist at a mainstream publication could quote from it. Someone might read it and that sparks them to invite me to speak at a conference. Or it could fall flat. It could "fail." That's the game, just like those job & university applications.
You never really know which one is likely to succeed, so the more good ideas, the better.
Many attempts will be duds that won’t spark any interest; a few will generate some notice and basically pay back your investment of the time required to create them; and a handful will spread to thousands or even millions of people!
Thanks to @jessweiss for suggesting the title for this blog post.
College app image - Shutterstock / Bronson Chang
Woman with notebook image - Shutterstock / Petrenko Andriy





Hi David,
I like where you're going with this. One of the things that must change along with the willingness to create and test out more ideas is the willingness to accept that some of them won't work and may not be measurable. You've talked about this a lot and I think it's key.
Unfortunately, that old mindset of requiring every campaign to produce positive ROI is still linked to dollars and cents instead of the benefits to learning, growing engagement and extending reach.
Instead of measuring the ROI separately on each idea, I think we need to start looking at what occurs based on their use in combination. More of an evolution than a one shot effort - which is what I think you're getting at.
Posted by: Ardath Albee | April 04, 2011 at 03:02 PM
You're conveying a few messages here David, and I think you're dead on with every one of them.
What's the most important part of this post? Well, it's all important, but the most important thing I'd say is the idea that failure doesn't kill you.
When it comes to business and marketing, what kills you is not trying enough.
Apply to one school and you're likelihood of "death" is high. Apply to a thousand and suddenly you can't lose, there's just no way.
Posted by: Tanner | April 04, 2011 at 03:38 PM
It costs the average person a few hundred bucks, along with some consumer-grade electronics and technical know-how - to get as much attention today as the big players do.
"Throw enough at the wall that something sticks" is pretty much how the Internet works. Our attention spans are weak online, and people spend a lot of time there.
Failure to a marketer these days is being ignored or misinterpreted into an instant PR crisis.
More generally speaking, as far as public discourse goes, one should never interpret something as "failure" when we KNOW WE ARE RIGHT.
To get positive outcomes in anything you hope to achieve, you must possess the right levels of persistence, patience, and proficiency. This is the only way to success in anything you do.
Posted by: Adam | April 04, 2011 at 04:55 PM
I'm one of those guys who is currently doing what you’re posting about. I live in the UK and failure is not tolerated here at all. But I went against this very British grain, as well as against my family and friends and FAILED.
Came out the other end saying “failure isn’t fatal”.
From having a good idea, I could sit on it for years, worrying whether it will fail, and if it does fail how I can live life with this failure on my back.
Worrying what other people would think about me, worrying about what my family and friends would think, especially what they would think if I was so stupid to launch another idea….
Or I could just launch it!
See what happens, fail quickly and cheaply. I personally will spend around 4 hours online doing desk research, buy a domain, make a logo, throw a quick website up and launch it (or a prototype, or even at times, pretend I have the offering/product). Then I monitor the feedback, buzz, comments, likes or lack of – and speak to as many people as I can. Face to face, over the phone, anything.
If it doesn’t work, I add that experience to my wealth of knowledge and use it to move onto the next project.
Failure isn’t fatal.
Posted by: Scottsbarlow | April 04, 2011 at 05:48 PM
The Culture of Failure, like Scott above me points out, is also view differently by different cultures. For instance, in California, especially in the Bay Area with the prevalent entrepreneurial culture, failure is a right of passage. You have not proven yourself until you have put yourself out there and failed.
Now, with ideas in marketing, the flood of branded content into the marketplace is creating the need to develop more effective methods of engagement. As more brands market themselves online with frequent branded content, consumers will become info-fatigued and only the producers who are providing the value that leads to transactions will succeed.
Posted by: Pamela Cargill | April 04, 2011 at 07:26 PM
Wow - I love these comments. Thank so much.
Ardath - "requiring every campaign to produce positive ROI" is one of the most harmful things there is in marketing today!
Tanner - I apologize for the length as I did not have enough time to make the post shorter... (I'm quoting someone but I forget who - Mark Twain perhaps?)
Adam - exactly. Passion drives excellence. Lack of passion is failure.
Scott -- "Failure isn’t fatal." I love this quote!
Pamela - it is indeed interesting to see differences in geography. I am currently in Australia on a speaking tour and am talking about "fear" and "failure" a great deal. There is a real mindset shift that needs to happen here.
David
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | April 04, 2011 at 09:39 PM
David,
I actually have a blog post written for tomorrow about a "fail cheap" experience that I had.
This past weekend, I wanted to test an offer for potential prospects. I set up a landing page using Unbounce and used Linkedin's advertising platform to send targeted visitors to the landing page. After 2 days, no one signed up for the offer.
I spent very little time and money to realize that this offer might not be a good idea.
In the old days it would have taken me at least a few hundred dollars and a month. Now I could draw the same conclusions in one weekend for $25.
Posted by: Greg Digneo | April 04, 2011 at 09:41 PM
I agree this.. Electronic files very safe compared to others.. Then this is great idea we can easily search that applications in that online.. Thanks for this information sharing with us..
Posted by: aluminium kozijnen | April 05, 2011 at 07:43 AM
Good post David. What I find is that most people are followers and terrified of criticism and the stigma of failure. As soon as something is proven they are there but until the road is clearly mapped out they wait in the wings.
We live in a culture of fear and worry rather than the entrepreneurship that is required.
Frank
http://FrankJKenny.com
Posted by: Frank | April 05, 2011 at 10:12 AM
Great post once again. I agree that more and more marketing teams just need to try things to see what works. The other aspect of this is that quite often companies spend too much time making things perfect before launching. It's so easy to fix or recreate that getting content posted or programs launched sooner rather than later is key.
Posted by: Brendan Ziolo | April 05, 2011 at 01:04 PM
Great effort Greg. Thanks for sharing your "failure"
Frank - Indeed many people are terrified of failure. It takes a mindset shift to get over that fear.
Brendan - exacelty... If you misspell "exactly" you can just fix it.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | April 05, 2011 at 03:00 PM
This chimes so much with what I'm learning doing Nikki Pilkington's 30 day blog challenge - she sends inspiration for blogs each day and I 'report' back to @nikkipilkington on Twitter using #30dayblog in the tweet with a link to my bright shiny new blog post.
Before this - and I'm only on day 4 - I would never have contemplated doing a blog a day. Having published lots of company newsletters and magazines before the online tools killed the corporate publishing game, I was stuck on perfection - with the fear of having to fund an entire re-print if I got it wrong. Check sources, proof it, spend time on the pix and design.
I do still proof and check sources, but the fear has gone. As you say, it's so easy to correct online.
As a bonus, Nikki's course is giving me 30 pieces of inspiration to pop into a list to keep me going when I have a flat day.
Plus I think there's something beautiful in the simplicity of reporting back via Twitter - a powerful training model.
I have no commercial interest in Nikki - just grateful.
Posted by: Penny Haywood Calder | April 05, 2011 at 04:54 PM
I completely agree, and very interesting insight! Great post!
Posted by: Ken Munsterman | April 05, 2011 at 07:10 PM
Thanks for a great article. I just launched my online nutritional brain supplement http://www.vavalertusa.com and with no real track record, it's about plastering your brand out there in as many places as possible knowing that the numbers will play out to where a few will stick! The results are paying off but it's a lengthy educational process and one that requires tremendous patience, both worth getting good at!
Thanks!
Posted by: Rami | April 11, 2011 at 10:14 AM
I agree on the points you're making here. On the post about Poke The Box you mention Google embracing this culture of failure. When I'm browsing other blogs I always see criticism of Google's failures, especially when they are launching a new project (which said blogs are usually predicting will fail).
It's great that some companies are embracing this, but I think there needs to be a paradigm shift within the media before more will jump on board. It would be even better for society as a whole to let go of the limiting beliefs they hold about failure, as Scottsbarlow above has.
What is your take on outside criticism of a business's culture of failure? Do you think it holds the company back in regards to media relations?
Posted by: Angelica Maduell | April 14, 2011 at 10:22 PM
The mass marketing approach works well for some business models and does no good for others. Skilled marketers who know the ins and outs of their business know when to use this approach and when not to use it. Mass following on Twitter, for instance, will gain you more followers but the quality of the leads will be questionable.
Posted by: Material Handling Equipment | April 18, 2011 at 06:27 AM
I like your article, interesting and have a good insight. I think failure is everywhere, but it depends on how you handle it.. keep safe!
Posted by: NotCathy@As Seen on TV Life | May 04, 2011 at 02:17 AM
Well written post and have a good insight.. Failure is my greatest weakness. Bu we need to accept the fact in this world failure is every where no one can hide it..:)
Posted by: As Seen On TV Shoppers | August 15, 2011 at 11:48 AM