In a completely boneheaded move, the Japanese Society for Rights of Authors, Composers and Publishers (JASRAC) announced that they want to set up a system to charge people who tweet any part of song lyric.
As reported (in the Japanese language) on J-cast news, they haven't decided on the details yet, but JASRAC insists it's the law and everyone has to obey with their decree.
"We want everyone to recognize that Internet is not your private place," JASRAC says. Even in the world of 140 characters, the law must be obeyed.
Yikes!
Music artists I know like Amanda Palmer (who has 400,000 Twitter followers) love when people tweet their stuff because they get more fans!
Here is what JASRAC is in the business of doing according to the JASRAC English language site: "Collect royalties from users of music in Japan and from foreign copyright societies and allocates them to trustors or transfers them to eligible foreign societies."
They are copyright cops.
Note that JASRAC is not in the business of helping artists. JASRAC is not in the business of advising on or provide services to artists to better market their work to new audiences. JASRAC does not help artists maximize income.
Here is a video called JASRAC wants my money made by Zemichi who says: "Apparently, JASRAC goes around the internet sending cease and desist to people that use ANY content that's protected under them. A quick search tells me that they've sent C&D's to LYRICS TRANSLATION sites too."
Note that JASRAC says it is okay to tweet the titles of the songs. (Thanks!)
JASRAC hasn't decided how much they'll charge when you tweet a lyric. "We are currently considering the handling in full compliance with the Act on Management Business of Copyright and Neighboring Rights," JASRAC says.
This just pisses me off.
Yes, I understand that artists need to make money. I get it: I make part of my income from royalties on books. In fact, the Japanese version of The New Rules of Marketing & PR falls under the JASRAC Stalinist control. (Thanks but no thanks. Can I get out from under you, JASRAC? I don't want you representing me!)
This Twitter policy from JASRAC is just plain wrong.
While I get that artists need to be paid for their work, putting draconian rules in place only seems to serve the JASRAC kingdom and keep them in power, it does not serve artists.
Artists are best served when people learn about their work from fans. And fans love to share on Twitter.
Please jump in to this one with your opinion!
++++++++
UPDATE March 4, 2010: Steve McClure, an expert on the Japanese music business, provides an update on the situation.
++++++++
Image credit: Shutterstock / Alexander Chaikin





David, thank god that they didn't catch you on a road humming the song and handed a "royalty payment pending slip" :D
Plain Wrong.
Posted by: Sachinuppal | March 02, 2010 at 09:20 AM
Seems like having just a few snippets of a song's lyrics would be considered "fair use" and non-detrimental to the artist. I don't know how it would play out in Japan, but I doubt that it would be considered a violation of the copyright holder's rights in the US.
Of course, I'm not an attorney, and can provide no legal advice (etc. etc.).
Groups like these are doomed to irrelevance, as even the artists don't support them for the most part.
Thanks for letting us know about this, and I'll definitely be keeping an eye out about the issue.
Posted by: Chuck Smith | March 02, 2010 at 09:31 AM
People just don't understand the need to take part in a "world wide rave" and get their art out in the public as much as possible. As that happens, they WILL make more money. Trying to control everything is just holding them back.
Posted by: Natasha Attal | March 02, 2010 at 09:35 AM
Thanks for the comments. I hope we can change some minds over there!
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 02, 2010 at 09:52 AM
And I thought American record companies were crazy!
Posted by: Jake LaCaze | March 02, 2010 at 10:00 AM
Moves like this don't upset me. Companies/people need to learn the hard way sometimes. Hopefully, they invite you to speak to their organization and share some of your case studies.
Posted by: Dan Schawbel | March 02, 2010 at 10:35 AM
David -
A colleague was fond of the phrase, "no fools, no fun!" Oops! Maybe I owe Spencer a royalty!
I suspect the "fair use" comments made above are valid. As well, I expect JASRAC would have to establish that the tweet was a commercial transaction and not conversational.
Regardless, this is a silly attempt by someone to monetize where they have no rights.
Posted by: Doug Brockway | March 02, 2010 at 11:00 AM
Hoo brother. This makes me want to find out all of those artists governed by JASRACket and start randomly tweeting their lyrics. Wonder if the artists would have a problem with that.
There's gonna be a helluva court battle over this, I bet.
Posted by: twitter.com/MattAtFlimp | March 02, 2010 at 11:02 AM
David,
Are there music lobbyists in Japan pushing for this? I wonder if Japanese artists are actually on board with this idea.
It seems like one of those things that looks good on paper, but in the long term will wind up costing people a lot of money.
They are effectively going to eliminate the smaller bands who rely solely on web tools to expose their fans to their music.
Posted by: Greg Digneo | March 02, 2010 at 02:28 PM
What an interesting idea!
All Steve Jobs has to do now is write and publish music in Japan that has his product names and key innovations in them, and now nobody can tweet about him!
Posted by: Ike | March 02, 2010 at 04:29 PM
It is human nature to post song lyrics. You get a song in your head and you want to share it or figure out what he heck it is. To charge the person posting it is bad. I mean why?
I know the artists need some revenue but charging the consumer for stating something about a song is ridiculous.
I know I post songs on FB and Twitter if they are in my head. I also work in the arena so sometimes I post the name of a song of which is going on during the performance. So are we going to get charged for every time we mention something?
This is bad.
Posted by: Jamie Favreau | March 02, 2010 at 04:38 PM
leave if to them wacky Japanese to come up with something crazy. Hey I love me some good 'ol Mazinger or Ninja Warrior. Those are great ideas. This one??? Nah...
Posted by: Paul Anthony Kelly | March 02, 2010 at 06:55 PM
This is just ridiculous, its not like its even the whole song, its probably just a few lines of lyrics. This is just crazy. If anything post song lyrics helps generate business for the artist. It is sort of a grass roots word of mouth campaign. I think in the end this will potentially hurt artists. Next thing you know were gonna be charged for singing a song...
Posted by: Ralph Leon | March 02, 2010 at 07:54 PM
Thanks to all for jumping in.
I wish that a rep from JASRAC would jump in.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 03, 2010 at 04:44 AM
So in theory if I did in fact stay at a YMCA and I tweeted. 'It's fun to stay at the YMCA' I'd be charged for it? Insanity!
Posted by: Jonin60seconds | March 03, 2010 at 12:18 PM
this is just another example of the how recording industry does not listen to their fans. Music has never been more popular and more in demand, and not just mainstream, but all genres of music.
Instead of the industry understanding and making music available the way fans want it, they try and fight the fans.
hope this does not carry over to other sites, countries, etc...
Posted by: Antonio Marsillo, LoudTrax.com | March 03, 2010 at 04:49 PM
Since Twitter users are not (presumably) tweeting lyrics for commercial gain, quoting lyrics in tweets would seem to come under the category of Fair Use. Unfortunately, there is no such category in Japan's Copyright Law, in which the "moral right" of the rights-holder is paramount. The only rationale that I can see for JASRAC charging Twitter for dissemination of song lyrics would be if Twitter were collecting advertising or other revenue on the strength of how many users it has. That said, there is a strong commonsense argument against charging copyright fees when lyrics are tweeted, in that tweets comprise a mere 140 characters, which means only a small part of a given song's lyrics could be quoted. One exception is, of course, the Trashmen's "Surfin' Bird," a surf-music classic of Beckettian minimalism: http://www.rockabilly.nl/lyrics4/s0130.htm
Posted by: Steve McClure | March 03, 2010 at 11:33 PM
You've hit the nail on the head by saying JASRAC aren't representing the artists interests, just their own.
This is how New Rules Marketing works. Having freedom to communicate.
Posted by: John Beckley | March 04, 2010 at 01:36 AM
John, Antonio, John -- yes strange indeed!
Thanks Steve for your perspective. Gang, Steve McClure has been in Japan for a long time. He is the former bureau chief for Billboard and is now Executive Editor, McClure’s Asia Music News
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | March 04, 2010 at 05:16 AM
This is excellent brand marketing for them! Where do I Paypal my money, JASRAC? I tried to send it to jasrac.LOL [at] yahoo.co.jp but it didn't work.
Hey, why stop there? They need to set up revenue trackers on Stumbleupon, Digg, Delicious, and Reddit.
Posted by: Chris @ The Basement Entrepreneur | March 04, 2010 at 11:16 AM
I agree with this Japanese society. JASRAC say that they want people to understand that the Internets is not a private forum and that Twitter is just like a blog or site where publishing lyrics is illegal. Would not be surprised if they go after folks who upload videos of themselves singing. Although they do require Karaoke parlors to pay a fee for the music being played to their customers.
Posted by: shakti | April 06, 2010 at 03:17 AM