Brand Journalism

Brand Journalism is when any organization—B2B company, consumer product company, the military, nonprofits, government agencies, politicians, churches, rock bands, solo entrepreneurs—creates valuable information and shares it with the world.

Brand Journalism is not a product pitch. It is not an advertorial. It is not an egotistical spewing of gobbledygook-laden corporate drivel.

Instead Brand Journalism is the creation of Web content—videos, blog posts, photos, charts, graphs, essays, ebooks, white papers—that deliver value to your marketplace and serve to position your organization as one worthy of doing business with.

I've been talking up this concept for many years now. While some people resist the ideas, I am now seeing more and more who agree with me, so I wanted to do a post to pull my thoughts together and point to some other people discussing brand journalism.

Skill Sets Required

I'm convinced that those with the traditional skills of marketing, public relations, advertising, and copywriting are not the right people to create brand journalism content. Instead you need the skills of a journalist.

The idea of hiring journalists is a new one at companies, but I think it is essential for success.

Here is a two-minute riff on this idea taken from a Q&A I did with Peter Himler after my keynote at Search Engine Strategies New York 2010. Peter writes The Flack and is founder of Flatiron Communications, and served as Chief Media Officer for Edelman Worldwide, following a decade with Burson-Marsteller as head of the agency's U.S. corporate and strategic media team.

Here's a post where I try to "recruit" journalists to these ideas in the hopes that they would consider working for "the man" in corporations. With many mainstream media companies laying off journalists, I think this is an important career option. An open letter to journalists: You have an amazing career opportunity on the Dark Side. Take a look at the comments.

Ashley Slaney is a master's student at the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism at Arizona State University. She asks: Is "Corporate Journalism" the Same as Public Relations?

Albert Maruggi says: David's Brand Journalism idea may result in an actual job position I call the "embedded corporate journalist", a paraphrase from the journalist embedded with military units in the Iraq War.

Companies, nonprofits, and the U.S. military

Here are a few other things to check out:

Armed with Science Brand journalism in the U.S. Military humanizes a huge organization

Imperial Sugar Company Newsroom ISC hired the skills of a print journalist, a television journalist, and a photojournalist.

What do you think of this concept of Brand Journalism?

Image: Shutterstock / Diagon

Comments

[Doug Brockway]

I believe the idea is spot on.

It also occurs to me that much of what passes for journalism today isn't, its PR and spin and gobbledygook. Whether the journalism is political, economic, sports or entertainment, and especially if its on TV, watch out.

One fear, if you succeed in this, you'll draw all the true journalists away from journalism into business. That will mean the death of real journalism... and it will all be YOUR fault.

Its good that the market has an iffy track record in responding positively to honest agents, analytic and objective.

[Natanya Anderson]

Thank you so very much for so beautifully articulating the need for a more journalism-based approach to brand content. While I've been excited to see more people "see the light" and start to move toward the creation of truly valuable content for customers, I've been somewhat saddened to see them try to do so with a PR or advertorial approach. While there is absolutely a need in today's marketing world for the brand to tell its story and meet its objectives, creating content that starts with the end-user's knowledge needs is a different beast all together. Marketing and advertising start with the brand. Journalism starts with the audience and that's why this approach is so critical to the success of any content initiative.

Happily, once a brand starts to take the journalism-centric approach to content, the data should show that the approach is working. Once we all have more data we can share the discussion should simplify even further.

[Dave Charest]

David,

Your audio clip is right on.

We are all publishers now. Such an opportunity for everyone, really.

I also believe aside from journalists, there's another opportunity for indie artists in theater, film, etc. The other storytellers.

[Npressmarketing]

Wow. I've never thought of hiring journalists before. Currently, I work with my marketing people to create and develop a content strategy but I think this is a very cool idea. Get some writers in the mix who are already thinking from a content perspective.

[Paul Sevensky]

David, I would argue that a public relations professional should already possess the skills of a journalist to be successful -- story-finding, research, writing and more. So I think a good PR pro could be a brand journalist.

[David Meerman Scott]

Thanks all for your comments.

Paul, not sure I agree with you. As a general observation, PR pros (in my experience) are not good at content creation. Of course there are exceptions, but I think those are few and far between.

David

[David Siteman Garland]

David - The key is you DON'T have to be Steven Spielberg or Stephen King to create content that does well online.

On the other hand you can't create crap.

The life vest and opportunity is content. Content created by passionate people within your organization big or small.

Passion defeats polish.

Storytellers. Journalists. Unique people in your company. Honing the skill set and taking a breath away from the control of "ads" and entering this new world of online content is what I've experienced is the key to success.

[Tallulah David]

Thanks for another great post, David. I first read this suggestion to hire a journalist in your book, "New Rules," and as a PR person, I have to say the idea intimidated me. I was glad to see that Paul brought up the question I was going to ask, which was "Shouldn't PR people already have that skill?" That was, after all, what my superiors advised during my first year in PR: "You have to THINK like a journalist."

Truth is, however, we DIDN'T think nor act like a journalist. We wrote press releases knowing (1) that they would need to pass the close inspection of marketing execs and board members, and assuming (2) that press releases were expected to be client/product centric.

After reading your response, I had to honestly think about what journalistic skills typical PR folks may be lacking. I think that one of them is also one of the most important assets a journalist can bring to a corporate/mktg team which is their license to be objective. PR folks aren't given that license because they traditionally aren't allowed it, nor do they expect it. Welcoming a journalist on board would change the mindset of an otherwise message-controlling marketing team. This shift in mindset alone would make it easier for PR folks to be more empowered in their counsel/writing/pitching.

With that said, would you ever consider doing a piece on how PR people could start honing the skills of a journalist. I've been blogging to actually practice thinking and publishing content like a journalist, but what else would you suggest to PR pros who aspire to become brand journalists? Is it possible?

Thanks David for your thoughts, always a pleasure.

-Tallulah

[Arthur Charles Van Wyk]

I like this post. It clarifies and simplifies what marketing on the internet should hinge on, centre around and have at its foundation.

With the internet as an enabler, the way we reach and communicate with people have changed ongoingly since 1993.

Al & Laura Ries, in the "Fall of Advertising.." book speaks of this.. perhaps not in terms as clearly as what we know and use today, but at its very core the Ries' say that brand building will more and more be achieved using compelling engaging content rather than clever tag lines and images passed off as advertising.

So my thoughts on "brand journalism" is that you have just coined a new term but conceptually the practise has been in existence for eons. I see social media, inbound marketing, content marketing, emarketing, digital marketing, new media marketing ALL as the same thing in principle. In practise however, they differ in line with the preferences of and the different facets of the practise utilised by their practitioners.

And I also do not believe that only journalists can "journalise". Writing - especially compelling writing - is not something that can be taught. People go to journalism school because they have a flair and merely need to sharpen the skill, get it directed intelligently or refine it. My belief is that anybody with something to say can speak to those looking to hear what he or she has to say.

Paraphrasing.. Brian Halligan calls it using content to position yourself to be found by those already looking for you. Larry Weber calls it influencing opinion through content. You call it creating web content that delivers value to your marketplace.

At its very core its all the same thing, regardless of what name we give it.

My two dollars..

[David Meerman Scott]

David (the other one) - well said. Thanks.

Arthur - thanks for jumping in. I disagree that this has been around for eons. Until I started writing about it in 2004, I did not see others on this bandwagon. While the Reis book talks about the rise of PR it does so not from the perspective that people in the brand create the content but rather that outsiders (the media mostly but also bloggers) write about companies.

Tallulah - Yes, I certainly think it is possible for a person with a PR background to gain these skills. I tell people who are evaluating partners to look at that potential partners content. So the same hold trues for a PR person. What does the site look like. Are they blogging? Creating videos? Writing ebooks? My theory is if a potential partner cannot do it for their own business, how can they do it for clients?

[David (McKee) Craig]

Although behind in the acceptance of many progressive marketing tactics (regulatory hurdles), I believe that many firms in the asset management industry have had some success with what you call "brand journalism" through general market commentary, thought leadership papers and resources that do not directly promote products. I would agree that a financially-astute journalist who enjoyed in-depth research could find a home as a writer in our industry.

After reading your book, I thought that perhaps I should start using my middle name too (two first names, and a last name for a middle name).

[David Meerman Scott]

DMcKC - I highly recommend using your middle name! DMS

[Arthur Charles Van Wyk]

Something this is kinda automatically "brand journalism" on its own is the use of the middle name is all written communications.

[David Meerman Scott]

ACVW - Yes. Just using the middle name!! DMS

[Linda VandeVrede]

In defense of public relations, I just wanted to say there ARE a few of us out there (maybe just the INTJs) who have always approached PR with the journalistic "inform/educate" first attitude. So I wouldn't discount all PR people in favor of journalists. Maybe I should have gotten editors I used to work with to stick up here on my behalf. :) In my book, "Press Releases are not a PR Strategy," my premise is that PR's goal is to inform, and that true PR is relationship-building thru good content, not spin. I have stuck to that principle thru my career and left employment and clients when that principle was compromised. This sounds very self-righteous, and I don't mean it to be so, but I did want to throw in some support for the idea that not ALL PR people fit the terrible image we've garnered.

[David Meerman Scott]

Linda - Yes, I absolutely agree.

But people like you who do take this approach are in the minority. In my experience, most PR people just pitch products and rely on others (mainstream media and citizen journalists) to write the content.

In my experience, very few create content for the companies they work for.

Again there are exceptions.

[Jaybaer]

Great post. What we've considered to be "brands" and what we've considered to be "media" are converging. How long until we see brands become full-fledged media outlets?

I'm working on a project for a large electronics company to sync their content creation to customer inquisitions. It's essentially a robust, content-driven FAQ that's perpetuated in social media and search-optimized as much as possible.

I have a post publishing soon that walks through the methodology. As noted in the comments, the concept of creating content to drive awareness and move consumers through the conversion funnel isn't at all new, but I see the adoption pace picking up speed quickly.

Incidentally, I really enjoyed your session at SXSW. Great format.

[Suzie Domnick]

David - I agree in principle with you idea, with one caveat. The success of this position within and for a company needs to be rooted in an understanding of branding, otherwise its just more publishing. I believe the knowledge of the brand and branding principles, combined with a journalist approach to publishing relevant content that benefits a brand and business is the key. The two concepts need to be intertwined for the concept to succeed in today’s competitive marketplace.

[Gerald J Leonard]

Hi David,
I agree with your thinking on branding in general. One thing I’ve learned is that if you do not take control of your branding activities someone else will. I am not a professional writer or marketing expert but I do see a major shift in how effective individuals and companies are positioning themselves using the concept of Brand Journalism and /or Thought Leadership.

[David Meerman Scott]

Suzie and Gerald - thanks for jumping in. I would not consider myself a "Branding expert." So any thoughts you have regarding what aspects of branding are required to do my concept of brand journalism well would be appreciated. David

[Ron Ploof]

David,

Just wanted to point you to two companies who are trying this approach.

In March 2008, Xilinx (field programmable semiconductors), hired Mike Santarini (displaced 13-year trade magazine journalist from CMP, EETimes, and EDN) to head up their Xcell Journal & Editorial Services. In April 2009, Cadence Design Systems (electronic design automation software) hired Richard Goering (17-year Editor with CMP)as a Sr. Manager, Technical Communications to write a corporate blog.

These two journalists have been practicing "brand journalism" and may have hints for us all.

[David Meerman Scott]

Hi Ron - cool. Thanks for pointing out both Mike and Richard and their new roles. It will be interesting to watch their progress.

David

[Mark McCarthy]

This is the naming (and never underestimate naming) of what is being done by few; but needs to be done by many. Those two words "brand journalism" will inspire ( and for some of us; help us identify ourselves to ourselves and to others.)

Thank you David, perhaps skilled writers who can compellingly provide unexpected value in the shadow of a brand will be more laser focused , consider moving into the space or be led by those with a more robust and purposeful direction.

Mark

[Barbara DePompa]

Hi David,

Thanks for a great piece, and a new name for what I've been doing for the past seven years. I recently struck out on my own after a long term relationship as a "custom media contributing editor" for a major tech publisher. Been struggling to come up with a new moniker, and will add "brand journalism" if that's ok!

Can honestly say after working with clients ranging from Fortune technology giants, to publishers, analyst firms and PR organizations, the skill set required is as unique as you described -- requiring more knowledge/writing skills than most organizations possess in-house. If you are a 'seasoned' journalist, a natural storyteller, someone who is passionate about creating compelling messages, and who understands that building credible messages is an absolute requirement, this evolution to custom content creation/brand journalism may present an opportunity for you, as it has for me.

[David Meerman Scott]

Barbara - Thanks for sharing your story! Yes, of course you can use the moniker.

Keep up the good work.