I want to know why companies insist on sending me press releases via email in areas that I clearly do not cover. What a pain in the butt to have to wade through these things in my inbox every day.
Don't get me wrong. I'm a fan of using press releases as a tool to reach buyers. You can read more about that in my free ebook The New Rules of PR. Press releases can be a valuable way to communicate.
I'm also a fan of sending personal messages to people to alert them to things that they may find interesting. I really do welcome the many emails and direct messages that people send me about things that I would enjoy seeing. Many stories in my books and speeches and this blog come from you. Keep them coming! (And thanks).
My problem is with press release spam. Sending press releases to people in areas they do not cover is spam. SPAM, Spam, spam.
What, exactly, do you want me to do with your stupid press release?
Here is a small sample of headlines (and subheads) of some of the releases I have received via email in the past few weeks. WARNING: SOME ARE IN ALL CAPS!
Can anyone figure out why I should care?
Appendix Sonovision-ITEP Signs Reseller Agreement with Inmedius® for Expanded Alliance: To Partner in Single Source Software and Services offering by Appendix
Image Microsystems Wins 2009 Texas Employment Award: Workplace training and employment programs for deaf and special needs community garner top honors for US technology restoration and e-waste recycling leader
Offerpal Media Marks Two-Year Anniversary with 160 Million Users and 730 Billion Virtual Points Issued: More than 2,000 publishers count on Offerpal’s virtual currency payment platform to monetize online games, virtual worlds, social networks and subscription services
Juan Pablo Giometti, President and CEO of National Hispanic Entrepreneurs' Organization to Attend Inside Kenan-Flagler Case Competition October 29 - 31, 2009
MediaBeacon Appoints Enterprise Content Management Veteran to Enhance and Expand Marketing Initiatives: Tom Rieger brings more than 20 years of industry experience to be the Vice President of Marketing and Business Development
LOCAL BUSINESSWOMAN DEBORAH PERRY PISCIONE WINS WOMEN’S INITIATIVE WOMAN-OWNED BUSINESS OF THE YEAR AWARD: Bay Area nonprofit for women entrepreneurs announces winners of 2009 competition
Emma Thompson, Helen Bamber to be honored by UN Journalists Nov 11
Inter-Pacific Securities Goes Live with SunGard’s GL Net for Direct Market Access to Malaysia
HighTech PR, Inc. Celebrates 10 Years in Business: Launches New Website in Honor of 10th Anniversary, Receives 2009 'Best of Orlando' Award in the Category of Public Relations by the U.S. Commerce Association (USCA)
NETSUITE DOUBLES PHILIPPINE OPERATIONS AND DELIVERS LOCALIZED SOFTWARE TO ADDRESS MARKET GROWTH FOR CLOUD COMPUTING BUSINESS SUITES: NetSuite Version 2009.2 Localized for Use by Philippines-Based Businesses Certified by Bureau of Internal Revenue
EA SPORTS LAUNCHES MOBILE MARKETING TOUR FOR FIFA SOCCER 10: FIFA Soccer 10 Launches with 15 City, Five-Week Tour Featuring Custom-wrapped Vehicles Equipped with the New 120GB PlayStation®3 Computer Entertainment System
FORMCLIQ™ INVOICES AUTOMATES AP WITH NO SETUP; AVAILABLE NOW STARTING AT UNDER $3,000
Telmetrics and TARGUSinfo Launch New Service to Improve Effectiveness of Direct-Response TV, Online and Print Advertising Campaigns: Combination of Call Routing and Call Measurement Solutions Helps National Advertisers Maximize B2C Conversions by Delivering Visibility into Campaign Performance
ONLINE STATIONER MOO.COM ANNOUNCES FIRST MAJOR UPDATE TO ICONIC MINICARDS: New MiniCards Give Individuals and Small Businesses More Creative Freedom To Promote Themselves and Showcase Their Work
Stylesight and Itochu Fashion System Co., Ltd. Team Up to Provide Localized Japanese Trend Information Service: B2B Trend Content and Software as a Service (SaaS) Provider is First to Address and Fulfill Global Client Demand for Growing Japanese Market
If you are a PR person and have sent me one of these releases, please remove me from your list. Thank you.
Image: Shutterstock / Julien Tromeur





What you just did validated their effort. All they are trying to do is get web hits. By publishing the headlines, you gave them what they are looking for. And now that you did it, they will continue to send them, even if you never do it again.
Posted by: Lou Covey | October 29, 2009 at 03:40 PM
Whew, thanks for the warning - you scared me with those capital letters! The untargeted, unpersonalized mass press release to anyone-who's-email-address-you-can-get-ahold-of is a shame, and a disgrace to PR.
Posted by: Cheryl Harrison | October 29, 2009 at 03:44 PM
Hi Lou - note that I did not link to them. So what good is the Web hit for them? Just a check mark that a PR staffer makes in a report to the company? David
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | October 29, 2009 at 03:44 PM
My eyes! My eyes!
I think you should reply with this link www.changethis.com/pdf/37.03.Gobbledygook.pdf
Posted by: twitter.com/changememe | October 29, 2009 at 03:47 PM
What's the deal with the all-caps headlines? "Screams" cheap...
Posted by: Rachel Bryant | October 29, 2009 at 03:49 PM
Terrible terrible terrible! And the headlines are boring too! Clearly they have not read ANY of your books!!
Posted by: twitter.com/23Kazoos | October 29, 2009 at 03:55 PM
To play devil's advocate, yes, these are all perfect examples of press release spam (and probably wretched press release writing, too). But sometimes--in fact, many times--the PR pro finds it impossible to push back on a client who wants you to send their shiny new press release to everyone on earth "just in case." The client sees no down side to this, because, after all, "email is free." And even when you explain why press release spam is a bad idea, some clients just don't give a rip--because they don't have any skin in the game. Why should they care about alienating journalists who wouldn't cover them anyway? It's the PR pro who suffers by being blacklisted, so it's the PR pro who has to learn how to push back.
Posted by: Kathleen Hanover | October 29, 2009 at 04:05 PM
Even if you did link to these, I'm not sure that your readers would actually click through to read the whole press release.
Five minutes spent reading your blog should have been an indicator that your audience wouldn't care about partnerships and new product launches. And they most certainly don't care about FIFA soccer.
I'd be interested to hear from one of the "spammers" to learn just how effective this tactic is.
Posted by: Greg Digneo | October 29, 2009 at 04:15 PM
Oooo! Oooo! Pick me! Pick me! I know why!! Oooo!
Email is free.
Give us HARDER questions David :)
Best as always
~ Bradley
Posted by: Bradley H. Smith | October 29, 2009 at 04:38 PM
I don't really get mad at spam anymore because I'm used to it. I delete these types of emails immediately (subconsciously).
Posted by: Dan Schawbel | October 29, 2009 at 04:43 PM
You obviously did not get your C1N1 (Corporate1Nonsense1) vaccine. It protects against viruses and corporate spam caused by cubicle monkeys with access to email and a send button.
Once infected I've found it helpful to respond with the "reporting spam" function on my gmail account. I also set up a dummy account where PR folks can send all the spam they want. I periodically review it and give companies who have a clue my real email. So you miss a story once in awhile. It's worth it not to have the C1N1 virus.
Posted by: Becky Blanton | October 29, 2009 at 05:07 PM
I get them too (got one today for laptops and I blog about food). I reply back to the sender and make them feel stupid with a "why is this relevant to me?" question. If it persists, I include the agency management on my replies, and have been known to contact the client to let them know how their budget is being wasted by their inept agency.
Posted by: Jeff Davis | October 29, 2009 at 05:08 PM
Great post - thanks David. Guess it just comes down to understanding your audience. If unsure - a personal approach beforehand to guage interest is useful - and builds relationships. In the age of one on one conversations - spamming press releases - is akin to mass marketing. Doesn't work.
Posted by: Anne Sorensen (Marketing Is Us) | October 29, 2009 at 10:36 PM
Great examples of what not to do. We send out very few email press releases and only to reporters who might be interested in our issue - adult literacy. We've just started to use paid web services and PitchEngine to distribute releases and it seems to be working. I really liked Louise's and Becky's suggestions.
Posted by: Ben Merrion | October 30, 2009 at 08:32 AM
All true. As you have aptly pointed out in your books, the News Release is not primarily for the press anymore (surprised you're using the term "press release") - it's a communication tool that should go directly to your marketplace through RSS and other means. Unfortunately, most still rely on the puffed-up self-proclamation as the main ingredient. Let's all be "world leading."
Kudos for just publishing the headlines and not trying to embarrass the senders (as did the tired-old Wired magazine).
David Gordon Schmidt
Posted by: David Gordon Schmidt | October 30, 2009 at 09:08 AM
I did a spoof press release to point out this ludicrous practice:
http://www.prlog.org/10152116-velocity-the-b2b-marketing-agency-releases-new-release.html
Ironically, it got us a bit of attention!
Posted by: Doug - Velocity, B2B Marketing Agency | October 30, 2009 at 09:22 AM
Great article.
The "checklist PR" folks clearly need to update their checklists.
As you have pointed out in your books, direct-to-consumer news releases - properly SEOed - delivered over the Web are a great way to reach the buyers who care about your expertise or need your product. D2C releases also reach bloggers and press (yes, they use Google alerts too.)
"Pull" PR is much more effective than the usual dialing-for-dollars crap. Helping the right people to "discover" a client makes the client much more valuable to them - and today there are so many ways that we can help the right customers, traditional press and bloggers discover clients, such as Twitter.
I still use email, but sparingly. I find that most reporters and bloggers do appreciate an advance or heads-up if the news is important and relevant to them.
I never, as a policy, email a blogger or journalist unless I read their work regularly or have familiarized myself with it. Yes, this takes a bit more time, but I feel that it's more cost-effective for the client in the long run.
The big challenge is educating clients on the new rules. I have given out about two dozen of your books to clients. It's a process, but I am encouraged by how many of them are starting to understand.
Posted by: Janice L. Brown | October 30, 2009 at 09:45 AM
Hi David,
As an associate that has a boss, I am often asked to send press releases out to people that I know do not cover my area. It drives me crazy. Maybe some of those listed are in the same position. Still struggling to get the new rules accepted.
Note: I am in the process of changing that...moving on.
Posted by: Melody | October 30, 2009 at 12:11 PM
I wish there were a more satisfying way of deleting this kind of annoying spam mail. Maybe an explosion sound effect, or the receding scream of someone being dropped into a deep pit. Anyway, Happy Halloween. :-)
Posted by: John Patella | October 30, 2009 at 01:09 PM
Those are really sad. Plus they are in Gobbedygook as well. So I can imagine how ticked you were when you opened it.
Posted by: Jamie Favreau | October 31, 2009 at 02:29 AM
To your point David I didn't even read your whole post. All those non-relevant messages just made me ignore it. Not sure it's what you wanted to hear, but it definitely makes your point a valid one.
Posted by: Mark Malafarina | October 31, 2009 at 06:59 PM
I really enjoy your blog and I mentioned it in my list of favorite marketing sites @ http://www.bradslavin.com/2009/11/01/top-online-marketing-resources-and-websites/
Posted by: Brad Slavin | November 01, 2009 at 08:55 PM
Those headlines made my eyes bleed. Seriously, I know clients can be - ahem - demanding, but still, I'm betting PR "pros" wrote 80% of those headlines without being forced to by the client. PR industry, heal thyself before casting all the stones on the clients.
Posted by: Mistie Thompson | November 02, 2009 at 03:32 PM
Blacklist 'em like TechCrunch. Great way to hold them accountable. My guess the client doesn't know what low levels agencies (or their vendors) go to on their behalf...
Posted by: Nalts | November 03, 2009 at 07:32 AM
I get a lot of that too, in fact sometimes I get really excited to try out a new product but then when you go to their site, oops...for U.S residents only..haha...what I do now is just keep a personal email and another email for subscriptions to other site. At least now I don't have to get all those unwanted email...but let's face it email campaign does work.
Posted by: Kyla, Web Designer | November 04, 2009 at 06:50 AM
David Gordon Schmidt
To Doug (Velocity)about your comment above: love your fake release, especially the "we're thrilled" part - if you read and believe news releases, you start to think there must be a lot of CEOs jumping up and down in glee out there.
You left out the typical hyperbole and bragging though. I have an analogy in my recent post:
http://btobopportunities.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/who-wants-to-have-a-conversation-with-a-braggart/
Posted by: David Gordon Schmidt | November 04, 2009 at 08:40 AM
Spam, Spam, Spam and Eggs... oh wait... threw me back into the Monty Python subworld. (The age-challenged among us might get this)
Posted by: MAS | November 04, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Rather than just putting them to rest, I am glad you pointed these out to show the importance of not spamming!
Many think that perhaps there is a chance that you will discuss an irrelevant press release, but from your book you make it clear that you rarely (if ever), cover stories that you receive from press release emails...Its all about what you find out on the web on your own.
These individuals need to focus more on strengthening their SEO and less on sending irrelevant content to trusted sources to get recognized by the appropriate outlets!
Thanks again David!
Posted by: Stephanie Shkolnik | November 04, 2009 at 02:16 PM
In this fantastic medium that we have before us - why do people have to spam us? Is it because it's too easy to just send the release to everyone?
ps. I just finished reading your book and put a review on my blog :)
I loved your book but I wished I read it two years ago. Still relevant today though
Posted by: Nigel Burke | November 12, 2009 at 06:09 AM
Hi David, Thank you for dropping by my blog! It really is exciting times that we are currently experiencing. I will be ordering your other books shortly and will review them for you too.
Nigel
Posted by: Nigel Burke | November 12, 2009 at 06:28 AM
Thanks Nigel.
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | November 12, 2009 at 08:47 AM
Its probably from the distribution services not the actual businesses themselves. The distribution really needs to be more targeted because they are charging businesses to send irrelevant spam that no one wants.
Posted by: Mountainland Applied Tech | November 30, 2010 at 04:10 PM
News are boring... Instead of giving you a happy day it gives you the other way around.
Posted by: Denz@Hosted dialer | March 17, 2011 at 10:42 PM