Something Is Very Wrong in PR Land
I'm a contributing editor at EContent Magazine. As a result I receive hundreds of press releases a week via email from well-meaning PR people who want me to write about their widgets. Guess what? In five years, I have never written about a company based on a press release that was sent to me. Never. Not even once. Discussions I've had with journalists in other industries confirm I'm not the only one who doesn't use press releases sent to me unsolicited. Instead, I think about a subject that I want to cover in a column or an article and I check out what I can find on blogs and through search. If I find a press release on the subject through Google News or a company's online media room, or via my targeted RSS feeds, great! But I don't wait for press releases to come to me. Rather, I go looking for interesting topics, products, people, and companies. And when I do feel ready to write a story, I often try a concept out on my blog first to see how it flies. Does anyone comment on it? Do any PR people jump in and email me?
Here's an amazing thing: In five years, I count on one hand the number of PR people who have commented on my blog or reached out to me as a result of a blog post or story I've written in a magazine. How difficult can it be to read the blogs of the reporters you're trying to pitch? You learn precisely what interests them.
It's nuts! When I don't want to be bothered, I get hundreds of press releases a week. When I do want feedback and conversation, I get silence.
Something's very wrong in PR land.



























You know the adage, "if you want to locate all the sinners, go to church?" Well, if you want to find people with absolutely no sense of empathy whatsoever, look to PR.
Regards,
- Amanda Chapel
Posted by: Amanda Chapel | August 09, 2006 at 11:04 AM
So the traditional news release is not working.
This is something I've heard from a number of other places.
What about--in your opinion--editorial calendar tracking and e-mail correspondence?
For instance, if I were to look on an editorial calendar and see a journalist who writes regularly on educational technology is going to be writing a story soon that's right up my company's alley, would sending him a quick e-mail with a link work any better?
Or is it just about the same? (In this case we'll say that journalist does not have a blog).
Posted by: Owen Lystrup | August 09, 2006 at 04:25 PM
Owen,
I think the traditional release that is blasted to PR people is not working. But a news release that is well written will be picked up by search engines and will be seen by journalists (and buyers) who are looking.
Following editorial calendars still works. One issue is sometimes you don't know which reporter is writing the story (you just see that the publication has a calendar). If you do know, I suggest a pitch that is very personal, that has a killer sublject line (so it is opened), that highlights something the reporter wrote before (so you show that you know them) and that says why your client would be good for the story.
And remember, the reason your client would be good for the story is usually NOT because of your client's widget. Rather it is about how your client solve problems for their customers.
David
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | August 09, 2006 at 05:07 PM
David,
Thank you for taking the time to keep us PR folks informed on what's working and what isn't. It seems that sure-fire methods that worked as recently as last week don't work today and we always appreciate being kept up to speed on what's making an impact.
I especially appreciate your comment about responding to stories. I understand that it's important to know what they're writing about to make sure this person would actually even be interested.
I have always tried to comment on a writer's most recent story when pitching them something I think would be of interest to their readers. I get a response about a quarter of the time.
My thought has always been that writers get thousands of these comments to their stories as they get thousands of pitches a day. But from your blog post here it seems that's not the case.
I'd like to ask you, what are you looking for in a reponse to an article that would make you want to engage in conversation with that person?
Thanks,
Aly
Posted by: Aly | August 09, 2006 at 05:28 PM
Hi Aly,
I get very few letters based on what I've written (several a month is all). But I get zillions of things, mostly broadcast email, from PR people asking me for something. I'm sure that a Wall Street Journal reporter gets a lot of mail about their stories than I do, but nowhere near as much as you might think. All reporters wantr feedback - both positive and negative. And all reporters hate the impersonal nonsense that we all get.
Try building a relationship with a reporter first without pitching your client. Praise a story or point out holes in it. The reporter will remember.
How about this one -- suggest an interesting story angle or analogy that has nothing to do with any of your clients. It you're a tech PR guy emailing a tech reporter, go way out in left field with something like: "Hey, have you thought about how similar such-and-such technology is to a Madonna Concert? Your story remind me of thi -and-that You should talk to Madonna's tour manager." (Something so far away from what you're pitching to be obvious that you're just doing it as a favor).
Then once you have a relationship built, try a pitch but make it interesting and relevant to that reporter. You should also make it clear that the pitch is just for them. "I thought of you this morning and that story you wrote a few months ago on..."
I got an email last week that opened:
"Dear %firstame%"
that's what sucks about PR. It's so cold and impersonal that many times firms can't even make the email blast software work correctly.
David
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | August 10, 2006 at 05:20 AM
David,
Thanks much for your advice. It's great stuff.
I think too many PR people are doing a little too much talking here in the big bad blogosphere, and not enough listening.
Posted by: Owen Lystrup | August 10, 2006 at 03:46 PM
I have been sufficiently chastened. You make a great point about reading a reporters's blog as a way to build a relationship and to make pitches more relevant. I spend a great deal of time thinking about how to match the story to the reporter, but not enough time thinking about his or her online presence.
At college, we learned to read our professors' books before writing papers. The same rule should apply to PR professionals.
Posted by: Dan Greenfield | August 10, 2006 at 05:51 PM
Well said Dan. And guess what? I am checking out your blog right now to find out who you are. Would I have done that if you sent me a release? Heck no.
David
Posted by: David Meerman Scott | August 10, 2006 at 06:13 PM
Again, I find myself nodding my head vertically while reading through one of your posts, David.
As a guy who both blogs and pitches (and used to do the "old" media thing too), I can say that traditional media want the same thing that bloggers want: Recognition (a little flattery or especially genuine interest in past items goes a long way), and relevance and value in the content of the pitch.
Take some time to read, leave a comment and start a proper relationship with the RIGHT author, and you'll have way better success.
Posted by: Jordan | August 11, 2006 at 12:34 AM
David; As a blogger, I know how frustrating it can be to post something and hear the crickets chirp. It makes perfect sense to read the people that you work with, and that includes reporters. I have long kept a delicious list that I read from time to time and certainly before I want to pitch. But as of this post, I am adding my favorite journalists that blog to a folder in my Sage reader. I will be sure to keep up that way.
Posted by: Kami Huyse | August 14, 2006 at 10:03 PM
Dear David,
I just found your wonderful blog, I don't even know how, because I had so many sites open. I click on interesting things and let the page load while I read another page.
>how your client solve problems for their customers
This should be the main issue talked and written about in all copy - sales copy and PR.
Keep reminding us of that - hopefully it will start to sink in.
The golden rule of doing onto others as you would have them do unto you, is so important to keep in mind at all times.
When we focus on helping others we automatically help ourselves.
I just put your blog feed into my BlogRovR account.
Posted by: Joni Solis | February 08, 2008 at 10:31 AM